Antitrust Practices and Market Power

In: Other Topics

Submitted By ashleydavis10
Words 549
Pages 3
Dentsply International and Market Power
Ashley Davis
DeVry University

Dentsply International and Market Power The Congress passed antitrust laws in effort to protect competition in the market, as well as consumers whom are the ultimate recipients in the market (Novak, 2007). The case that will be discussed in this paper will be a company that was found guilty of violating section 2 of the Sherman Act, which focuses on people that are trying to monopolize the market for their own benefit, or someone that is trying to get complete control within an area of the economy. With the Sherman Antitrust Act in place, monopolization is very illegal and the act tries to prevent it from happening and protect competitors in the market (Novak, 2007). Dentsply International is a company that makes dental products, but their main product sold is false teeth. The company sells product in over 100 countries, so it is a very large company. The company sells its products to dealers, who then sell the false teeth and other products to dental labs. These labs then distribute the product to dentists with the supplies they need. If you don't include false teeth, the company supplies buyers with millions of dollars of products and dominated the artificial teeth market since they had close to 80 percent of the market share at the time they were being sued (Novak, 2007). Dentsply told their dealers that they had tell sell their supplies and deal primarily with them. When the Dentsply did that, it made many dealers unhappy, and was the reason for the antitrust action the government brought against them. This prevented dealers that carried Dentsply products from adding other tooth lines to their list of products they offered and if they refused to follow Dentsply demands, Dentsply could refuse to fill any more orders for that dealer (Novak, 2007). According to Novak, (2007), the…...

Similar Documents

Capital Market in Bangladeshtrends and Practices

...CAPITAL MARKET IN BANGLADESHTRENDS AND PRACTICES PRESENTED BY: AMALENDU MUKHERJEE & MD.GHULAM FARUQUE DHAKA, BANGLADESH BANGLADESH: PROFILE Geographical Location : 20°34’ &26°38’ North Latitude 88°01’ & 92°41’ East Longitude Area( Sq.km) : 147570 Standard Time : GMT+6 Hours Population (Mn) : 152.6 Population Density/Sq.Km.,2006 (Estimated): 953 Inflation(2006-07): 7.22% 6.51 GDP(2006-07): Per capita national Income (in Tk.) 35904 Capital market in Bangladesh Bangladesh capital market is one of the smallest in Asia but the third largest in the south Asia region. It has two full-fledged automated stock exchanges namely Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) and Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE) and an over-the counter exchange operated by CSE. It also consists of a dedicated regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), since, it implements rules and regulations, monitors their implications to operate and develop the capital market. It consists of Central Depository Bangladesh Limited (CDBL), the only Central Depository in Bangladesh that provides facilities for the settlement of transactions of dematerialized securities in CSE and DSE. History of Stock Exchange Dhaka Stock Exchange was set up on 28th April, 1954 that started formal trading on early 1956. Post–independence government did not promote a capital market during the first five years, and it was activated again in 1976 with 9 issues on board. In 1995, a second bourse, the Chittagong Stock Exchange, was......

Words: 1756 - Pages: 8

Pricing Practices in Market Economy

...22 Objectives of Pricing Pricing Techniques Categories of Pricing Methods New Product Pricing Policies Product Mix Pricing Strategies Product Line Pricing Five geographical strategies Pricing in Practices Two-Part Tariff with Two Consumers Bundling in Practice Pricing science Pricing of Multiple Products Products with Interrelated/Interdependent Demand Pricing Practices in Market Economy 25 Theories To Get You Started Arbitrage pricing theory Cost-of-production theory of value Multiple-product Pricing Multi-product pricing Conclusion 1 Pricing Practices Pricing practices sometimes seem peculiar. When first-class hotel rooms in London, Tokyo, or Paris go for $300 to $500 per night, Holiday Inns offers Weekend WebSaversSM rates at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport from as low as $62.48 per night—more than 50 percent off regular prices. Not to be outdone, Howard Johnson’s says vacations are more fun with family package rates up to 70 percent off regular prices. Meanwhile, Marriott offers advance purchase rates on the Internet for as low as $59 per night at the Courtyard Marriott Village at Lake Buena Vista, Florida. At the Hilton Durham, in North Carolina, weekday rates are $109.95 and $89.95 on the weekend. What is going on here? Rather than a mad scramble to build market share at any cost, hotelchain rates represent a shrewd use of information technology. Any night that hotel rooms stand empty represents lost revenue, and because hotel costs are largely fixed,......

Words: 17587 - Pages: 71

Antitrust Practices and Market Power

...Antitrust Practices and Market Power | DeVry University | Eva Wise | Antitrust Policy consists of laws and government actions designed to prevent monopoly and promote competition. On June 23, 2011, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission initiated an antitrust probe into Google, the world’s largest search engine. FTC’s investigation entailed a broad probe into Google’s business practices and weather it was abusing its search power to drive traffic to its own properties over rival sites and services. After a nearly twenty month high-profile investigation, the federal government announced on January 3, 2013, that its dropping an “exhaustive” probe into Google as it found no evidence the company was abusing its search power. Google was investigated under violating the Sherman antitrust act. “The definitive antitrust statute, passed by Congress in 1890, that prohibits monopolies or unreasonable combinations of companies to restrict or in any way control interstate commerce. Specifically outlawed is two or more persons engaging in monopolistic practices, such as price fixing, although it does not outlaw price-fixing per se. It was amended in 1914 by the Clayton Act, which outlaws interlocking directorates and deals with acquisitions that aim to restrain or eliminate competition. (Your Dictionary Law)” “For example, one element of a duty-to-deal claim under the Sherman Act is proving that Google’s treatment of rival websites harms consumers; even the cleverest economist would......

Words: 550 - Pages: 3

Antitrust

...Antitrust Practices Michael D. Kelley Chamberlain College of Nursing Principles of Economics Econ-312N Allison Thomas March 24, 2013 Antitrust Practices The search for a current antitrust case has led me to the Department of Justice (DOJ) website and to something near and dear to my heart, beer. Upon reading a few articles, it has been proposed by the DOJ that Anheuser-Busch has requested to buy Modello, the third largest brewer in the country, therefore threatening competition and subsequently changing the marketplace economics. Since there are two main producers of beer in the United States of America (USA) namely Anheuser-Busch (39%) and MillerCoors (26%) accounting for 65% of the marketplace, the merger of Anheuser-Busch and Modello, could potentially violate section & of the Clayton Act. Section & of the Clayton Act state when one company gain’s sufficient stock in an opposing company to the extent that competition would suffer as a whole, then the company acquiring the smaller competitor would be in violation of the Clayton Act, specifically Section 7. In this particular instance, Anheuser-Busch has part ownership in the Modello company, as is. If it is allowed to acquire the remaining portion of the company, it will be able to have such a market share in the beer industry; it can potentially drive up beer prices and upset the entire market. Anheuser-Busch claims it would sell its shares to the competitor, Constellation Corporation, allowing......

Words: 824 - Pages: 4

Antitrust Practices and Market Power

...source: Academic Center for Evidence-Based Practice Location of source (URL): http://www. Acestar.uthcsa.edu Owner or publisher: The university of Texas health science center at San Antonio Describe (in your own words) the research database or collection of research including the purpose and the subject matter it covers: The purpose of this site is to provide the most up to date research and education to its users. It also provides health care knowledge to nursing and health care practices. This database is also dedicated to bringing research into the practice of improving care, outcomes and safety. The site is again free to users. Explain how the source relates to your topic of interest: This source provides me a place to educate myself to evidence based practice. It also gives me the most up to date site when researching my area of interest. This site has many useful articles associated to my chosen topic. #4 Database (or collection) (30 possible points): Title of source: American Nurses Association Location of source (URL): http://www.nursingworld.org Owner or publisher: American Nurses Association Describe (in your own words) the research database or collection of research including the purpose and the subject matter it covers: The database provides nurses a site that has collection of material on nursing practices. It has a code of professional nursing attached to it; The ANA welcomes nursing practice and is tthere for all nurses......

Words: 927 - Pages: 4

The Power of the Market Essay

...After watching the first part of the documentary “ The power of the market, I can say I now have a much better understanding of what free markets are, the way these work, and more especially how this ideology developed into the economic hub of the world leading potency, China. A free market economy is an economy in which the allocation for resources is determined only by their supply and the demand for them, not by some designated authority. Hong Kong is an example to this, as they implemented a free market structure and it worked out quiet well. Prices set the foundation to any market, and if a free market economy is to be established, prices must be free to reach their own levels. In a free market, pricing should be based on the preferences of consumers and sellers, putting aside any government rules, regulations and policies that can possibly affect the course of the market. From the author’s point of view, which I happen to share, free markets work best for all members of society in achieving prosperity as each and every person is free to pursue their own objectives. Having the freedom to make the most of each person’s abilities and decide their own price standards, definitely gives people the chance of reaching better standards of living. It is the ordinary people of Hong Kong who benefit from this market structure. People are able to trade with whomever they want, buy from any source they want, sell to whom they want and set the price standards they are willing......

Words: 587 - Pages: 3

Antitrust

...…………………………………………………………..page 1 Microsoft Antitrust Investigation……………………………………..page 2 Market Structures……………………………………………………..page 3-4 Disadvantages of Monopoly Market………………………………….page 4 Advantages of Monopoly Market…………………………………….page 4-5 Conclusion…………………………………………………………….page 5 References…………………………………………………………….page 6 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to identify an antitrust investigation for a firm, to discuss the reason for the investigation, and the impact its impact on the firm. The paper also identifies the practices and power of monopoly and oligopoly market structures. It also discusses the advantages and disadvantages of monopoly market. Microsoft Antitrust Investigation According to CNN Money News, the European Union found Microsoft guilty of breaching a 5 years commitment to providing EU customers a choice of browser (Thompson, 2013). This verdict came after an antitrust investigation of the company. Antitrust law is one that was put into place to help foster competition in market and to prevent large companies from breaching these agreements. In the case of Microsoft, the EU utilized the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914. McConnell and Campbell (2012), describe this Act as one that outlaws techniques that firms use to develop monopoly power. The EU ruled that Microsoft’s behavior did give customers a choice thereby decreasing competition. Microsoft like Google operates under a monopoly market system meaning that they have increase market power......

Words: 1048 - Pages: 5

Antitrust Practices and Market Power

...Antitrust Practices and Market Power Antitrust Practices and Market Power Content Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..Page 2 Case for Antitrust Behavior……………………………….……….…..…………….Page 2 Antitrust and Market Power…………..……………………………………………...Page 3 Benefit of Monopoly………………………………………………………….……...Page 4 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….......Page 4 References………………………………………………………………………........Page 5 Antitrust Practices and Market Power Introduction First of all, what is antitrust? It was first introduced and advanced by the neoclassical economists. We also call the antitrust law as the "competition laws". The main purpose of developing the antitrust law is to ensure fair competition in an open market economy, thus protect the consumers and maximize social welfare. Case for Antitrust Behavior I consider the case of Microsoft as the perfect antitrust law case of the antitrust police. On May 18 1998, United States of Department of Justice initiated the lawsuit towards Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft was accused of becoming a monopoly and engaging in abusive practices contrary to the Sherman Antitrust Act 1890 sections 1 and 2. The accuser alleged that Microsoft was being monopolistic because its product Windows requires bundling IE, Intel, and MSO which are all it’s own products. In other words, people that wants to use Microsoft Windows has to buy all the sub-products in order to make the whole system run normally. The settle...

Words: 572 - Pages: 3

Antitrust Laws and Market Power

...Abstract Antitrust laws were put in place to make sure markets are free and open, which is the foundation of a vibrant economy (ftc.gov). The benefits of these laws are mainly for the consumer, and they infuse competition in any market space, which ultimately leads to good prices and high quality products and services. To better assert the fact that Antitrust Laws have in fact been enforced for the protection and benefit of the consumer, one must look at actual cases in which organizations have been investigated for violation of Antitrust Laws. In the following paper, I’ll be focusing on Apple’s antitrust investigation. Additionally, we’ll identify some costs associated with the antitrust behavior, and why Apple was investigated? To conclude, we’ll then shift our focus to weighing out whether or not monopolies and oligopolies benefit society, with at least looking at one study where they did benefit. Apple Gets Investigated and Charged Apple, which has an oligopoly market structure because of their number of competitors, pricing similarities and dependencies with other vendors, was hit with a huge fine for antitrust violations (in the 840 million range). Apple was investigated for helping facilitate a price hike in the e-book market space by colluding with major publishers. The U.S. Department of Justice said this conspiracy was designed to undercut online retailer, Amazon.com Inc’s dominance of the fast-growing e-book market (Reuters, 2013). However, what really drew......

Words: 1032 - Pages: 5

Antitrust Practices

...1. Why was the firm investigated for antitrust behavior? Back around 2003 there were complaints made by dentists to the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners about non-dentists that were providing teeth whitening services at low cost. The Board, after hearing the complaints, issued cease and desist letters to all twenty nine teeth whitening providers who weren’t dentists. This effectively ousted all non-dentists from the teeth whitening market. 2. Identify some of the costs (pecuniary and non-pecuniary) associated with the antitrust behavior (firms having power in the market). Additionally, note the specific antitrust act (Sherman Act, Clayton Act, etc.) under which the violation was investigated. When it comes to antitrust with the sense of a dollar figure, it can be a bad when it comes to fix pricing. Back in the day it was a big problem when companies were monopolized over things such as steel, tobacco, railroads, etc. The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 is being violated in this case as making the non-dentist teeth whitening’s prohibited; it was an unfair method of competition. The dentists didn’t like the competition and thus removed them entirely to make sure that only they could provide the service this would also give them the choice of whatever price they wanted if they so choose. 3. Given your research and findings, are monopolies and oligopolies (firms demonstrating power) always bad for society? Be sure to provide real world examples of where......

Words: 569 - Pages: 3

The Rise of a Market Power: D’long,

...The Rise of a Market Power: D’Long, 1996-2001 Little is publicly known about D’Long’s early years beyond rough details. The original parent company of the group, Xinjiang Delong Co., was formed in 1986 by four brothers: Tang Wanxin, Tang Wanli, Tang Wanping, and Tang Wanchuan. Tang Wanxin, the youngest of the brothers and CEO of the company, was the key strategist and apparently the only person with complete knowledge of D’Long’s operations; Tang Wanli served the number two position as chairman of the board. The company was originally involved in color film processing, but soon branched out into other fields.20 One of the firm’s first successful large-scale ventures came in 1994 with JJ’s Disco in Beijing, which reportedly yielded RMB 30 million in annual income. In 1992, two years after the creation of China’s first formal stock exchanges in Shanghai and Shenzhen, D’Long began investing in China’s stock market; by 2003, many people believed it to be the market’s single largest investor.21 D’Long’s rise as a stock market superpower began in October 1996, when it became the fourth- largest shareholder in Xinjiang Tunhe, a state owned cement company that had gone public three months earlier, by acquiring legal person shares from two affiliated SOEs.22 In 1998, D’Long increased its control over Tunhe from 10% to 40% by acquiring the company’s non-listed parent. Under D’Long’s control, Tunhe soon moved beyond cement to invest heavily in tomato paste, building new......

Words: 4503 - Pages: 19

Economics312 Antitrust Practices and Market Power

...Question: Antitrust Practices and Market Power Research authoritative articles using the news and the DeVry Online Library (http://library.devry.edu) for a recent case of antitrust investigation. You are free to choose a case from any industry and any part of the world. Based on the case you have selected, answer the following questions. 1.Why was/were the firm(s) investigated for antitrust behavior? 2.Identify some of the costs (pecuniary and nonpecuniary) associated with the antitrust behavior (firms having power in the market). Additionally, note the specific antitrust act (Sherman Act, Clayton Act, etc.) under which the violation was investigated. 3.Given your research and findings, are monopolies and oligopolies (firms demonstrating power) always bad for society? Be sure to provide real world examples of where this may be the case to strengthen your position. 4.Provide at least one example of a case where having a monopoly or oligopoly may actually benefit the society. Based on your findings to the questions listed above, write a report with a minimum of 300 words in essay format in APA style (use the APA template in Doc Sharing), using correct economic terms covered in the discussions. If you ONLY write 300 words, you probably won’t be able to fully answer the questions. Key concepts to include in your paper include the following. • Monopoly Market Structure •Oligopoly Market Structure • Barriers to Entry Into the Market •Natural Monopoly......

Words: 336 - Pages: 2

Antitrust Laws and Competitive Business Practices

...Antitrust Laws and Competitive Business Practices The fair, balanced and competitive application of U.S. laws as applied to business practices Introduction Several laws have been enacted to provide protection to businesses in our free-trade market. There are times when trading within the free market does not demonstrate the fair, balanced and ethical conduct deserved in competitive business. Trying to compete in a market where practices aren’t regulated deprives businesses the benefits of competition, resulting in higher prices for products and services which in turn affect the economy. Unfair trade practices have been around for as long as trade itself. Unfair practices were under scrutiny as early as 470 B.C. Grain was so vital to Greece’s population that trade laws were enacted. A percentage of grain was taken by the state therefore taxes were applied to anyone not importing directly to Athens. Death applied to anyone restricting imports (http://www.ancient.eu/article/115/). The latter was definitely extreme but regulations now cover a broader range of violations with less severe consequences. The federal government enforces three major antitrust laws. These laws address unfair practices that deprive businesses the benefits of interstate and international trade. Federal antitrust laws apply to virtually all industries and to every level of business, including manufacturing, transportation, distribution, and marketing. The Sherman......

Words: 1264 - Pages: 6

Antitrust Practices

...Principles of Economics Antitrust Practices By: Bryan Williams July 25, 2013 In this case I think Dell was a little selfish and thought they could get credit for all of the work done! In this article they are talking about a patent that was not approved which Dell implemented but later was enforced against various VL-bus manufacturers. The mechanism transfers instructions between a computer's central processing unit and its peripheral devices. In the article it states that the patent was a violation. Due to all parties being members of the Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) they had their fair share of credit in the development of this mechanism. In the next case a patent was placed by the plaintiff and the defendant ignored the law and now is being sued for violation. Personally I don’t understand why the law couldn’t be abided by and I can understand that the law had to be enforced. The defendant eventually filed a counterclaim for alleged improper conduct on the plaintiff. It’s rightfully so because it seems as if the plaintiff was trying to be sneaky in their attempts to put a patent in place. The case was investigated under the Sherman Act and said the plaintiff had denied access to its technology. In the end the courts refused the defendants counterclaim and said that the plaintiff’s actions did not cause alleged injury to competition. I’m sure if the plaintiff had come to the defendant on different terms they could’ve come to a decision that......

Words: 348 - Pages: 2

Mc 6- Firms with Market Power

...the monopolist? A 400 B 300 C 200 D it is impossible to answer this without knowing about the cost structure. 5. A monopolist A can raise its price without losing any sales because it is the only supplier in the market. B can earn a greater than normal rate of return in the long run. C always charges a price that is higher than marginal revenue. D both a and b E both b and c 6. A firm with market power A can increase price without losing all sales. B faces a downward-sloping demand curve. C is the only seller in a market. D both a and b E all of the above 7. A monopoly firm faces a demand function P = 30 - 0.075Q and the corresponding MR function, MR = 30 - 0.15Q. At any price above $______ demand is elastic. A $5 B $10 C $15 D $20 E zero 8. As above, a monopoly firm faces a demand function P = 30 - 0.075Q and the corresponding MR function, MR = 30 - 0.15Q. If production costs are constant and equal to $10 (i.e., LAC = LMC = $10), what price will the monopoly charge? A $5 B $10 C $15 D $20 E $25 9. In a monopolistically competitive market, A a firm has market power because it produces a differentiated product. B a firm earns economic profits in the long run because it has market power. C there are a large number of firms. D both a and b E both a and c 10. Monopolistic competition is similar to perfect competition in that: A there are a large number of firms B firms earn economic profits......

Words: 1445 - Pages: 6

The Child in Time | Sebastian Urzendowsky | Dead Man's Walk