Comparing Quality Awards

In: Business and Management

Submitted By chuleo86
Words 4366
Pages 18

A Comparative Analysis Of National and Regional Quality Awards by Robert J. Vokurka, Gary L. Stading and Jason Brazeal



1980s. Due to successful Japanese efforts, U.S. industries began to discover the competitive advantages that quality could bring and how the lack of a quality system could bring an end to business. With customers demanding quality and competitors responding to such demands, businesses turned to total quality management (TQM) as the key to enhance overall performance. As customer expectations increased and performance improvement initiatives were implemented, quality evolved from a product specific focus to an organizationwide effort, from a separate manufacturing function to a strategic business initiative. The quality function was expanding, and with that came new practices concerning continuous improvement. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, several countries established programs to recognize the inventive, yet effective, quality practices taking place—once again, after Japan, which began honoring quality practices in the 1950s. The criteria of most of these award programs encouraged strategic initiatives in the approach and deployment of quality practices. But as with most successful quality initiatives, the award programs underwent continuous improvements in design and administration. In their pursuit of TQM, organizations around the world began turning to quality award programs for more than just the recognition such programs offered. Industries realized that the awards also offered models and tools for implementing a quality strateQU A L I T Y P R O G R E S S



2 0 0 0




gy, benchmarking best practices,…...

Similar Documents

Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Awards

...Johnathan Songer 12.9.12 Professor Sacco Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Awards Motorola Under the seven key areas: leadership; strategic planning; customer focus; measurement, analysis, and knowledge management; workforce focus; operations focus; and results, Motorola qualified for the Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Awards. In 1988 the company was recognized for outstanding success in these areas. After nearly one thousand hours of review and site visits, the company displayed a strong sense of management and operational skills as well as a particular feel for training and development. Atop the list of managerial methods at Motorola is their use of Six Sigma in order to measure the amount of defects in a batch of product and hopefully reduce that number. Operating under the Six Sigma Quality requires the company to produce variation while maintaining consistency. A more noticeable quality of Motorola in the eyes of the public would be the company’s ability to reduce cycle time and by doing so, the time from which an order is received to when it is delivered can be shortened to the direction of maximum efficiency. Before Motorola conceives these types of ideas, top-level management meetings are held to discuss and review quality programs such as these. Not only are all levels of the company involved, the Participative Management Program (PMP) bonuses account for 3% of Motorola’s payroll. In order to obtain employees capable of upholding such responsibility,......

Words: 338 - Pages: 2

Indonesian Quality Award

...harus benar-benar dipertimbangkan. Bahkan beberapa kerusakan kecil dapat mengakibatkan malapetaka untuk produktivitas ke depannya. Indonesian Quality Award (IQA) Indonesian Quality Award (IQA) adalah penghargaan pencapaian kinerja ekselen organisasi yang diukur berdasarkan hasil assessment menurut kriteria Malcolm Baldrige. Proses penilaian untuk pemberian penghargaan ini berlangsung setiap tahun. Participant dalam penghargaan ini adalah organisasi/perusahaan yang bergerak dalam bidang Bisnis, Non Bisnis, Kesehatan dan Pendidikan baik swasta maupun pemerintah. Proses "awarding" diawali dengan "assessment" dan dilanjutkan dengan penganugerahan  penghargaannya. Kegiatan ini diselenggarakan oleh IQA Foundation secara periodik setiap tahun. Tujuan pemberian penghargaan : * Memberikan Penghargaan kepada organisasi atas usaha membangun kinerja ekselen, dan pencapaian dan pertumbuhan kinerjanya dan appresiasi yang tinggi atas pretasi pada perusahaan yang  meraih skore tertinggi dalam ajang ini. * Meningkatkan  kesadaran  bahwa  kinerja  ekselen  sebagai  elemen  penting  bagi organisasi  dalam bersaing. * Berbagi  informasi / Sharring tentang  keberhasilan  dalam  penerapan  strategi kinerja  sehingga dapat dijadikan referensi bagi mereka yang sedang dalam membangun kinerja ekselennya.- Alasan ikut partisipasi dalam Award IQA  adalah akan mendapatkan publikasi positif dari satu institusi yang credible, secara gratis dari masyarakat luas dan masyarakat......

Words: 764 - Pages: 4

Advanced Quality/Management System - Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria

...The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (herein referred to as Baldrige) was enacted into law in 1987 in order to encourage U. S. industry to pursue competitive improvements. The major thrust being the improvement of quality of product and services. The award was named after a former Secretary of Commerce who was killed in a rodeo accident. It is administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) that in the Commerce Department. The award winners are required to share (non-proprietary) information on successful performance strategies and actions, and benefits derived. Eligibility allows for two awards in each of three categories: • Manufacturing companies • Service companies • Small businesses • Education • Health Care (Education and Health Care were added in 1999) The following is an outline of the formal Baldrige process: 1. Applicants prepare an application, i.e. a description, of their quality/management system following the Baldrige guidelines. 2. For Phase I, five to seven examiners evaluate the application and address each category/item of the criteria. The strengths and areas needing improvement are noted for each item and the point score allocated. All seven guideline categories allow for 1000 point possibility. 3. The best applications based on the examiners' comments and scores are submitted to the Baldrige judges. The judges screen the examiner’s reports and select the best applications for a Phase II (consensus)......

Words: 694 - Pages: 3

Impacting Organizational Learning - the Training and Experiences of Quality Award Examiners and Assessors

...Impacting Organizational Learning: The Training and Experiences of Quality Award Examiners and Assessors Prof. V.K. Susil Kumar Faculty and Manager – Placements Institute for Technology and Management, 11/D 14, Fourth Main Road, SIPCOT IT Park, Siruseri, Rajiv Gandhi Salai (OMR), Pudupakkam Post, Chennai – 603103 Landline: 044-32974148 Mobile: 9380502425 Abstract The Training and Experiences of Quality Award Examiners and Assessors aim to show that developments in the quality award assessment process in organizations can make a contribution, within a wider framework of organizational learning. The underpinning theoretical argument is that quality award models and associated organizational assessment processes can be used to achieve much wider benefits, than that of quality per se. The quality award assessment process has been applied in organizations from the mid-1980s to the present. The process uses models such as the Business Excellence Model and the Baldrige model. These models use an interpretation of quality, which is based on the holistic approach of total quality management. In parallel with the development of the assessment process, there has been considerable development in the field of organizational learning with an emphasis on developing learning based skills in employees. It shows how the learning experiences and skills developed and enhanced through the assessment process can be applied within an organization’s approach to learning in......

Words: 3642 - Pages: 15

Keller Gm588 Quality Award Paper

...------------------------------------------------- Quality Award Paper IndustryWeek Best Plants Award Keller Graduate School of Management Spring Semester, May 2010 Session GM588: Managing Quality (online) Instructor: Robert Lee 14 May 2010 Table of Contents I. Purpose and Background 4 Penton Media’s IndustryWeek Publication 4 Quality Award 5 Award Background 6 Award Principles 6 Award Details 7 Entering the Competition 7 Application Process 7 Selection of Finalists and Winners 8 Timetable for 2010 Award Application 8 II. Award Criteria 9 Award Background 9 Award Application and Selection 9 Important Criteria for Award 10 III. Benefits of the Award 12 Individual Company Benefit 12 IndustryWeek Best Plant Award Applicant’s Intrinsic Benefits 13 Application Fee and Preparation Costs 14 Marketing Benefits 14 Challenges in Receiving the Award 15 IV. Past Winners 16 Strategies and Competencies of IndustryWeek’s Best Plant Winners 16 Core Strategies 16 Supporting Competencies 16 IndustryWeek’s Best Plants Winners (2007-2009) 16 2009 Award Year Winners 16 2008 Award Year Winners 17 2007 Award Year Winners 17 Top Three Winners from 2009 Award Year 18 Batesville Casket Co., Manchester, TN 18 Carrier - Carlyle Compressor Facility, Stone Mountain, GA 19 E-Z-GO, A Textron Company, Augusta, GA 21 V. Conclusion 23 Personal Thoughts 23 References 25 Purpose and Background * Penton Media’s IndustryWeek Publication Since January 1970,......

Words: 4898 - Pages: 20

Nova Award

...Purpose and Background The NOVA Award was created by the Construction Innovation Forum in 1989 to recognize and encourage advancement and improvement in all areas of the construction industry. The Construction Innovation Forum, founded in 1987 is an international, non-profit organization formed to recognize innovations in the industry that improve quality, efficiency and most importantly, cost. It defines innovation as having a positive, important effective on construction or service, improving quality and reducing time or cost. Innovation is not limited to any one area it includes design, fabrication, building, detailing, rehabilitation, contract administration, labor relations, management, training, procurement, maintenance, equipment, materials, concepts or methods (Learn More About CIF). The founding chairman, Dr. Robert I. Carr has a degree in Architectural Engineering and Civil Engineering and is a life member of the American Society of Civil Engineers. With this background he implemented both the NOVA Award and the Construction Innovation Forum as a response to the Construction Industry Cost Effectiveness survey conducted in the early 1980's by Business Roundtable. The survey determined that the construction industry was lacking in the areas of productivity, skilled workers, managing increasing cost, fragmentation and the area of research and development (Robert I. Carr). In 1985, Steve Allen of the Dept. of Economics and Business for North Carolina State......

Words: 1281 - Pages: 6

Comparing the Quality Management Practices in Uk Smes

...The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at Comparing the quality management practices in UK SMEs Maneesh Kumar Strathclyde Institute for Operations Management, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK, and Quality management practices 1153 Received 5 May 2008 Revised 23 June 2008 Accepted 17 July 2008 Jiju Antony Centre for Research in Six Sigma and Process Excellence (CRISSPE), Strathclyde Institute for Operations Management, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK Abstract Purpose – The last two decades have witnessed an explosion of research into the area of quality initiatives (QI) such as ISO, total quality management, lean, Kaizen and its application within small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). However, very few empirical studies have reported the application of Six Sigma in SMEs; the reasons may be attributed to several myths associated with Six Sigma. The purpose of this paper is to assess the current status of QI in the UK manufacturing SMEs and report the differences in the quality management practices of Six Sigma SMEs against the ISO certified firms. Design/methodology/approach – A survey-based approach was adopted to understand the established quality management practices in the UK SMEs. A short survey instrument was designed by reviewing the literature on quality improvement initiatives in SMEs. A sample of 500 manufacturing SMEs across UK was selected through stratified random......

Words: 6237 - Pages: 25

Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award Winner Pewaukee School District

...Writing Assignment Stephen M. Hardy BUS 3302-140701 Leadership Apollo’s University Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award is the national quality award that recognizes U.S. organizations in the business, health care, education, and nonprofit sectors for performance excellence. The Baldrige Award is the only formal recognition of the performance excellence of both public and private U.S. organizations given by the President of the United States. It is administered by the Baldrige Performance Excellence Program, which is based at and managed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Up to 18 awards may be given annually across six eligibility categories manufacturing, service, small business, education, health care, and nonprofit. Pewaukee School District 2013 Award Recipient The tiny school district in this rural town has captured the attention of America by winning the coveted and prestigious Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, which honors performance excellence in education, healthcare and business organizations. The Pewaukee School District, an innovative public school system, was one of only three organizations nationwide to receive the 2013 award. Winning the nation’s highest Presidential honor for performance excellence and visionary leadership is no small feat. The Pewaukee school system, which totals 2,791......

Words: 842 - Pages: 4

Quality Award

...participating in a Quality Award programs. In the State of Utah, we have the Utah Quality Award that is a prize or reward provided to businesses and institutions that wish to share in the value and achievements associated with continuous improvement. Utah joined member states in 1995 under the governorship of Michael O. Leavitt in accordance with the best international practices in the field of quality management. Today, Utah Quality Award office is stationed at the Utah State building. According to the charter statement, “the Utah Quality Award program was developed to provide opportunities for all organizations in the State that fall under the category of manufacturing, service, schools, colleges, universities, health care, government and non-profit organizations” [1]. Award Criteria The Criteria for selection is very unique. In part, it provide the organizations and its leadership an opportunity on a regular bases to think through and adjust their plans in accordance with constant changing business patterns. Thus, the Utah Quality Award criteria are based on the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award that was created in 1987 by the National Institute of Standards and Technology where Quality is simply defined as meeting and or exceeding expectations. There are several types of awards, which can be presented to companies or individuals. And in Utah, as of last year, “there was four award classifications: the Utah Continuous Quality Improvement Award, the Utah Quality......

Words: 783 - Pages: 4


...In 1991 n. Krugman is the outstand- ing international economist among his generation and has played a leading role in virtually every important development in international economics during the past decade, making path-breaking contributions to the "nonmonetary" theory of international trade and, in the study of open-economy macroeconomics, to the analysis of the determinants of exchange-rate movements. While in its sheer volume Paul Krugman's scholarly output has been nothing short of phenomenal, the quality of the individual papers and their impact has been still more impressive. If he has not been the sole contributor to the major reorientations with which his name is associated in our thinking about international economics, and about economics more generally, it must be acknowledged that in remark- ably many instances he was first and most influential. Paul Krugman joined The New York Times in 1999 as a columnist on the Op-Ed Page and continues as professor of Economics and International Affairs at Princeton University.Mr. Krugman received his B.A. from Yale University in 1974 and his Ph.D. from MIT in 1977. He has taught at Yale, MIT and Stanford. At MIT he became the Ford International Professor of Economics.Mr. Krugman is the author or editor of 20 books and more than 200 papers in professional journals and edited volumes. His professional reputation rests largely on work in international trade and finance; he is one of the founders......

Words: 3830 - Pages: 16

Baldridge Award

...The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award is the nation’s only Presidential award for achievements in business performance and quality. It is the highest level of national recognition for performance excellence that an organization can receive. The award is administered by the Baldrige Performance Excellence Program and was established by congress to promote national awareness of the necessity of performance excellence in business as a means to stay competitive in the global market. The Baldridge award recognizes U.S. organizations in a wide range fields. As many as 18 awards may be given annually across six eligibility categories including, education, health care, manufacturing, nonprofit, service, and small business. (Baldrige, 2015) Applicants undergo a rigorous screening process which evaluates the organization on a range of factors that contribute to financial performance. These factors include, but are not limited to, business decisions and strategies that improve market performance, customer retention/ satisfaction, efficient and effective operation practices, and gains in market share. (Baldrige, 2015) All organizations participating in the application process receive a written summary of their strengths and an assessment on areas for improvement. Winners are allowed to promote and advertise their Baldridge Award. However, the award is not given for specific products or services. As of 2014, 105 awards have been presented to 99 organizations which include six......

Words: 733 - Pages: 3

The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award

...Our group have found a publicly trade company named MidwayUSA which won the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award at least five years ago. The MidwayUSA Company had already won this award for about 3 times, in 2006, 2009 and 2015. MidwayUSA is an Internet retailer offering “Just About Everything” for shooting, hunting, and the outdoors. In 2009, the annual revenues of MidwayUSA is $185 million, and in 2015 their gross sales in excess of $350 million. Over the past 11 years, the company has been one of the fastest growing in its industry, sustaining a 43.8 percent average annual growth rate in net income and a 21.3 percent average annual growth rate in gross sales. These dramatically exceed the national benchmarks of 4 percent and 6.9 percent, respectively. Return on assets has averaged 80 percent for the past five years, a rate significantly better than the 20 percent benchmark of the Risk Management Association. In 2009, based in Columbia, Missouri, MidwayUSA has 243 fulltime and 100 part-time employees. In 2015, MidwayUSA employs more than 350 at its facility in Columbia, Mo. Many in the company’s workforce have a deep passion for shooting, hunting, and outdoor sports, allowing them to use personal knowledge and insight to better serve their Customers. At my point of view, this company success by putting customers first, MidwayUSA is a customer driven, customer connected kind of company. What’s more, they care for neighbors and nature. For example, MidwayUSA’s overall......

Words: 361 - Pages: 2


...Pascal Debowiak Mrs. Morse Comparing/Contrast Essay 02/03/16 The Environmental benefits of bicycling There are numerous reasons to own a car. Every day people drive a car to get to work, visit friends, buy groceries and complete many other chores. We are, like it or not, dependent on automobiles. However, bicycles are often a useful alternative and are more environmentally friendly. A car is but also costly and often difficult to pay for. To begin with, buying a two-year old car is smarter than purchasing a new one. After a new car depreciates a couple years, it can be purchased for thousands of dollars less. But whether buying new or used, the car’s cost is only part of the expense. Paying for insurance, maintenance, gas, and repairs adds significantly to the expense. Being able to repair a car yourself helps keep costs down, but there still is an expense. Costs of purchase, maintenance and repair aside, automobiles have an adverse effect on the environment that bicycles do not. Even before a car is driven it consumes energy. Automotive production leaves a giant footprint because materials such as steel, rubber, paints, plastics, and glass must be created before a new ride is ready to roll. But that’s not all; air quality suffers because vehicles are America’s biggest air quality compromisers, producing about one-third of all U.S air pollution. The also contribute to global warming. These findings have caused engineers to develop more eco-friendly cars for the future.......

Words: 666 - Pages: 3

Quality Award Application

...2009 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Application TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations Organizational Profile i Responses Addressing All Criteria Items Category 1: Leadership 1 Category 2: Strategic Planning 6 Category 3: Customer Focus 10 Category 4: Measurement, Analysis, and Knowledge Management 14 Category 5: Workforce Focus 18 Category 6: Process Management 23 Category 7: Results 7.1: Best Quality (Healthcare Outcomes) 27 7.2: Best Customer Service (Customer Focused Outcomes) 32 7.3: Best Financial Performance & Growth (Financial & Market Outcomes) 35 7.4: Best People and Workplace (Workforce Focused Outcomes) 38 7.5: Best 5 Bs (Process Effectiveness Outcomes) 41 7.6: Best 5 Bs (Leadership Outcomes) 45 GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS APP: Annual Planning Process 5Bs: AtlantiCare’s five “Bests” or performance excellence commitments – Best People and Workplace, Best Quality, Best Customer Service, Best Financial Performance, Best Growth ARMC : AtlantiCare Regional Medical Center ASC: Ambulatory Surgery Center ASPP: Annual Strategic Planning Process A AAAHC: Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care AAI: AtlantiCare Administrators Incorporated AAP: Annual Action Plan B BFP: Best Financial Performance Big Dots: The system-level measurements or targets for each of the 5 Bs (performance excellence commitments).......

Words: 41167 - Pages: 165

Baldrige National Quality Award for Health Care Organizations

...Baldrige National Quality Award for Health Care Organizations Elaine Reeves HCA 375 – Ashford University Paula Arceneaux December 5, 2011 Quality Improvement in Healthcare Health care is something commonly visited with my family and me. Having three children in the last seven years, my family and I have had our share of hospital and medical office visits. The quality in care does not go unnoticed as I see many areas that need improvement, as well as other areas that are exemplary. One measure that many organizations utilize is continuous quality improvement (CQI). It is a structured organizational process by which personnel plans and executes a constant flow of improvements in order to provide exceptional quality healthcare (McLaughlin & Kaluzny, 2006). CQI is an approach to quality management, where traditional quality assurance is implemented and emphasizes on the systems of the organization. Aside from gaining satisfaction and confidence from patients, quality improvements of a healthcare organization (if applied successfully) can earn prestigious awards. When quality in healthcare meets government regulations and standards, and when satisfactory is met with the public and/or patients, many organizations are recognized for their achievements in quality. Some organizations are rewarded, along with their recognition, with awards reflecting their success. One such award is the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. Stated in the article Four U. S...

Words: 2350 - Pages: 10

Printing Graphic Arts | Film streaming gratuit | Gold Rifle Shape Black Ink Ballpoint Pen Stationery Office Ball Point Novelty