Constitution Essay

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By navyboy89kw
Words 874
Pages 4
Constitution Paper
Kevin Walters
HIS/110
October 13, 2014
Kellie Rainka

Constitution Paper The United State began acting as so during the Revolutionary War, even before the Articles of Confederation were drafted and ratified. By understanding how the Articles of Confederation came to be, one can see why the Constitution was needed. The Constitution addressed weaknesses within the Articles of Confederation and it addressed the complaints regarding the Declaration of Independence. It included Great Compromise, which outlined how the states would be represented in Congress. The Articles of the Confederation were drafted between 1776 and 1777 because the Continental Congress had been acting on behalf of Americans without having the authority to do so (Schultz, 2012). “In the absence of a federal government, theContinental Congress had assumed a number of rights and responsibilities, such as creating theContinental Army, printingmoney, managing trade, and dealing with debt” (Schultz, 2012). The Articles of Confederation lacked in certain areas, however, and did not really create any new ideas. The Articles of Confederation essentially just put on paper how it was in America at that time. The Articles of Confederation did not give the central government much power at all with most of the power residing at the state level. Initially, the central government included only one representative per state, making up the “Committee of the States” (Schultz, 2012). The Constitutional Congress, on the other hand, had five powers under the articles: (1) to declare war and make peace; (2) to make international treaties; (3) to control Indian affairs in the west; (4) to establish a currency; and (5) to create and maintain a postal service (Schultz, 2012, p. 120)
The states held the powers that would lead to funds for the country,…...

Similar Documents

Constitution

...CONSTITUTION OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH 4th November 1972 PREAMBLE We, the people of Bangladesh, having proclaimed our Independence on the 26th day of March, 1971 and through a historic war for national independence, established the independent, sovereign People's Republic of Bangladesh; Pledging that the high ideals of absolute trust and faith in the Almighty Allah, nationalism, democracy and socialism meaning economic and social justice, which inspired our heroic people to dedicate themselves to, and our brave martyrs to sacrifice their lives in the war for national independence, shall be fundamental principles of the Constitution; Further pledging that it shall be a fundamental aim of the State to realise through the democratic process to socialist society, free from exploitation-a society in which the rule of law, fundamental human rights and freedom, equality and justice, political, economic and social, will be secured for all citizens; Affirming that it is our sacred duty to safeguard, protect and defend this Constitution and to maintain its supremacy as the embodiment of the will of the people of Bangladesh so that we may prosper in freedom and may make our full contribution towards international peace and co-operation in keeping with the progressive aspirations of mankind; In our Constituent Assembly, this eighteenth day of Kartick, 1379 B.S corresponding to the fourth day of November, 1972 A.D., do hereby adopt, enact and give to ourselves this......

Words: 20973 - Pages: 84

Constitution

...by a constituent assembly or granted by a monarch to his subjects like the constitution of Japan in 1889. 2. Cumulative or Evolved Like the English Constitution, one which is a product of growth or a long period of development originating in customs, traditions, judicial decisions, etc., rather than from a deliberate or formal enactment. As to their form: 1. Written One which has been given definite written form at a particular time, usually by a specially constituted authority called a "constitutional convention. 2. Unwritten One which is entirely the product of a constitutional evolution, consisting largely of a mass of customs, usages, and judicial decisions together with a smaller body of statutory enactments of a constitutional character, usually bearing different dates. The English Constitution is unwritten only in the sense that it is not codified in a single document. Part of it is written - The Acts of Parliament and judicial decisions. Indeed, there is no Constitution that is entirely written or unwritten. As to manner of amending them: 1. Rigid or inelastic One regarded as a document of special which cannot be amended or altered except by some special machinery more cumbrous than the ordinary legislative process. 2. Flexible or elastic One which possesses no higher legal authority than ordinary laws and which may be altered in the same way as other laws. The Philippine Constitution may be classified as conventional or enacted, written, rigid or......

Words: 1057 - Pages: 5

Constitution

...Name Tutor Class Date of submission Constitution The constitution of the United States has three articles that explain the how powers are separated as well as checks and balances among the branches of the federal government. The federal government consists of three main branches that have separate powers. The three branches of the federal government include; the judiciary, the executive as well as the legislature. Among the three branches, each one of them is tasked with independent as well as separate functions and mandate. Among the three main branches of the federal government, there is none of them which can assume the functions of another. The separation of powers provides specific functions for each branch. The legislature which consists of the congress makes the laws for the nation, the executive that consists of the president implements the laws while the judiciary that entails the court system interprets and defines legal conflicts (Peterson 89). There is none of the three branches which can assume the functions of another. However, the three branches of the federal government are interrelated. They collaboratively work with each other hence checks and balances for the federal government. The checks and balances ensure that there is no single arm of the government that attempts to assume too much power (Peterson 78). Under the checks and balances for the federal government, the functions of one arm of the federal government are used as to control as well......

Words: 324 - Pages: 2

Constitution

...Exclusionary Rule Evaluation Tawanna Whitley CJA/ 364 Feb. - 25, 2014 Debra Austrin Exclusionary Rule Evaluation Criminal procedure has its ups and downs due to the fact of different remedies involving the constitution rights. A remedy is basically the enforcement mechanism for violations of the people’s rights (Worrall, 2012, pg.41). These remedies falls under two categories which are legal, and extralegal. The extralegal remedy are remedies that are conducted outside the legal process such as vigilantism and the legal remedies are those that are made by law, a court decision, and police agency policy or procedure. In the criminal procedure process the most significant remedy is the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule means exclusion; it states any evidence that was obtained in any violation of the constitution will not be presented in a criminal court to prove guilt. In 1886 the rule was used in the case Boyd v. United States (116 U.S. 616 [1886], Worrall, 2012).With this case the courts held that the evidence was improbably obtained and it was within violation with amendment fourth and fifth. The fourth amendment is illegal search and seizer while the fifth Amendment secures self-incrimination. By 1960 different states had come up with their own version similar to the exclusionary rule such within Elkins v. United States (Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 [1960], Worrall, 2012) . In this case the silver platter doctrine has been accessible. This......

Words: 1506 - Pages: 7

Constitutions

...Constitution From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Constitution (disambiguation). A constitution is a set of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is governed.[1] These rules together make up, i.e.constitute, what the entity is. When these principles are written down into a single document or set of legal documents, those documents may be said to embody a writtenconstitution; if they are written down in a single comprehensive document, it is said to embody a codified constitution. Constitutions concern different levels of organizations, from sovereign states to companies and unincorporated associations. A treaty which establishes an international organization is also its constitution, in that it would define how that organization is constituted. Within states, a constitution defines the principles upon which the state is based, the procedure in which laws are made and by whom. Some constitutions, especially codified constitutions, also act as limiters of state power, by establishing lines which a state's rulers cannot cross, such as fundamental rights. An example is the constitution of the United States of America. George Washington at Constitutional Conventionof 1787 signing of the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution of India is the longest written constitution of any sovereign country in the world,[2] containing 444 articles in 22 parts,[3][4] 12 schedules and 118 amendments, with......

Words: 16003 - Pages: 65

The Constitution

...1. Why is the idea of amending a definition of marriage into the Constitution so controversial? Do you think the controversy is over the issue itself (i.e., same-sex marriage), or the fact that the Constitution is being used to address this issue? Explain. The controversy surrounding same-sex marriage is due to the Constitution being used to address the issue. Some factions would argue that marriage is more of a religious, social and moral issue than a political one. The Constitution was written to protect the people’s political freedom and also limit the powers of the government, hence a political document and not a moral one. Though the Bill of Rights was drafted to define basic liberties such as freedom of religion, speech, and press and guarantee defendant’s rights (Edwards, Wattenberg and Lineberry, Page 56); it does not specifically mention marriage as a right or liberty. Others would argue that through interpretation of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has established that marriage is a civil right and an amendment would limit the rights of individuals to the “pursuit of happiness” as included in the Bill of Rights. References: Edwards, George. C; Wattenberg, Martin. P and Lineberry, Robert. L. Government in America. People, Politics, and Policy. 2012 Election Edition. 2. Which of the groups that you examined above opposed the amendment, and why? Which ones supported the amendment, and why? National Organization for Marriage (NOM) supported the......

Words: 530 - Pages: 3

Historical Essay 1 - Confederation and Constitution

...                        Historical Essay: Confederation and Constitution By History 405 Professor Aimee James January 26th, 2015 Historical Essay: Confederation and Constitution Confederation and Constitution As Colonial America moved from civil disobedience to open war with Britain, the States, at the behest of the Colonial Congress, started drafting constitutions and in the process “became laboratories for constitutional experimentation” ( Keene 120). The need to ensure a strong union and to ensure that it was strong enough to deal with both internal and external issues drove the colonies to send delegates to Albany to draft the Articles of Confederation. Ratified in 1781, the Articles of Confederation framed a new United States of America. The Articles of Confederation did not create a national government, “but rather a firm league of friendship” (Keene 121). Ultimately a fear of recreating the issues that were driving them from British rule shaped the Articles of Confederation and created a weak government with little power. It setup a national legislature called Congress where each state had one vote. It had no power to levy taxes, regulate commerce or otherwise interfere with the States. It could create money and declare war or peace. Notably any changes or amendments required a unanimous vote of Congress and “because of its weaknesses, Alexander Hamilton and other delegates called for a convention to be held in......

Words: 1571 - Pages: 7

Constitution

...especially the white communities in the South. The United States Constitution has secured an unprecedented degree of human freedom, upholding the rule of law, securing the blessings of liberty, and providing the framework for the people of America to build a great, prosperous, and just nation unlike any other in the world. George Washington thought that it was “little short of a miracle” that the delegates could agree on the Constitution. Americans had stumbled on this road before. The United States had established an earlier constitution in 1781, the Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles, each state governed itself through elected representatives, and the state representatives in turn elected a weak central government, one so feeble that it was unworkable. This league of states, hastily crafted during wartime, had to be replaced with a real government. The challenge was devising stable institutional arrangements that would reconcile majority rule and minority rights, that is, reflect the consent of the governed but avoid majority tyranny. The new constitution would need to secure the rights promised in the Declaration of Independence and do so through a republican form of government. The founders responded with a written Constitution that created a strong government of limited powers, with the then-novel institutions of the separation of powers and federalism. Amendments to the Constitution Amendment I The first ten Amendments (Bill of Rights) were......

Words: 428 - Pages: 2

Constitution

...LatishaDollison HIS/115 Mr. Randy Shuler Constitution Paper University of Phoenix 3/29/15 America is glorified as a land of freedom. As a country we have certain rights and Privileges gained simply by the fact that we are American citizens. We are also fortunate that these rights are protected through what is called the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These Documents protect our truths and rights as a citizen. This wasn’t always so. There had to be a Time before the Constitution and in that time it was a verbal war between those for it an against. The people who were for the Constitution were called Federalists. These people Understood that the Constitution that was being debated was highly important if not essential to the form of government the people desired. They were well organized men and women. Surprisingly they were less than half the population. Because of their organization and determinism they did end up winning the verbal war and the constitution was accepted and Ratified by all the states eventually. The Federalists procured victory over a long period of time however. It was a slow ongoing war. They were fighting against many people and sometimes almost whole states. The Process was laborious and harsh. It was back and forth and George Washington stated in his letter to Henry Knox, “Under the circumstances enumerated in your letters, the favorable decision, which has taken place in that State, could hardly have been expected. Nothing less......

Words: 1303 - Pages: 6

Constitution

...Policing CRJ201 June 28, 2015   Title of Your Essay The 4th amendment of the United States Constitution states “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things seized.” I believe that many cases have been brought to the United States Supreme Court define the constitutionality of the 4th amendment. I strongly believe that this is a fundamental for all law enforcement officers, and officers of the court to follow and strictly adhere to while they are excluding the duties of there occupation. In the case of Weeks vs. United States, police officers entered the home of Freemont Weeks and seized lottery papers which were used for his conviction in court. This seizure of papers was done without a lawful search warrant and done so in violation of the 4th amendment which was the main issue of this case. The evidence seized was used against Mr. Weeks in court and ultimately Mr. Weeks was convicted and sentenced to time in prison. There were several laws that the courts used in determining the outcome of this petition including Boyd vs. United States. “As was there shown, it took its origin in the determination of the framers of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution to provide for that instrument a Bill of......

Words: 942 - Pages: 4

The Constitution

...each state had its own agenda, and there seemed to be groups that stuck together (big vs. small, north vs. south, etc.), all depending on the issue at hand (Brackemyre, n.d.). Third and final issue with the Articles of Confederation that the Constitution fixed was a lack of central leadership. The US History Scene told me that there were again three major problems with the ability to have a centralized leadership. The first issue being that there was not a government funded judicial system in place; each state had to supply their own. This not only gave them the power to judge the guilty as they saw fit, but it also gave them the ability to overthrow any government based decision that they deemed disagreeable. This also meant that there was no place for the people to go to with a complaint or lawsuit regarding the national government. Next was the issue that there were no executives to deal with foreign affairs. With no one to deal with other countries, there was no way to arrange peaceful relations. The final issue was the inability to deal with threats, of any kind (internal or external). While only Congress could declare peace and war, they did not have the right to build their own military. For all of these weaknesses, the constitution made adjustments that gave the national government the necessary control to unify and protect the country. The government was given the right to levy needed taxes with a majority rules vote. State representation was changed in such a way......

Words: 1448 - Pages: 6

Constitution

...Constitution What is a constitution? • Set of rules seeking to establishing the duties, powers and functions of the various institutions of government • To regulate the relationships between and among the institutions • Define the relationship between the state and the individual, define extent of civil liberty Types of Constitution • Codified and uncodified o Codified – enshrined in law and based on 1 single authoritative document outlining powers of institutions + government, as well as a statement of the rights of citizen’s ▪ Document is authoritative, highest law of the land. Binds all political institutions – leads to 2 tier legal system ▪ Provisions of it are entrenched, difficult to amend or abolish ▪ It is judiciable, all political bodies are subject to authority of the courts, in particular a supreme court. o Uncodified – increasingly rare, UK one of few ▪ Not authoritative, constitutional laws treated same as ordinary laws ▪ Not entrenched, constitution can be changed through the normal process for enacting statute law. ▪ Not judiciable, judges do not have legal standard to declare that actions of other bodies are constitutional/not constitutional. o However: ▪ No constitution is entirely written, written documents do not encompass all aspects of constitutional practice ▪ No constitution...

Words: 2123 - Pages: 9

Historical Essay #1: Confederation and Constitution

...Historical Essay #1: Confederation and Constitution Anthony Snow DeVry University 08/01/2015 HISTORICAL ESSAY #1: CONFEDERATION AND CONSTITUTION As with anything in this world there are always strengths and weaknesses when people are comparing two different items, as no one item can be a perfect solution; there are always compromises. The same happens when we are comparing the Articles of Confederation and the New Constitution of 1787. Both of theses two solutions each have their own strengths and weaknesses. First we have the Articles of Confederation that when written gave each state a lot of individual powers, and because of this was one of the main reasons for the New Constitution, and I want to show how these two solutions are different, and how the New Constitution uses some of the same concepts that make up the Articles of Constitution. I would first like to take a look at the Articles of Confederation, and explore some of the strengths and weaknesses that came as a result of adopting it. The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation on November 15, 1777. One of the main weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation was that although it was able to produce a confederation of sovereign states, it was also responsible for weakening the central government, as the Articles of Confederation gave almost all of the power to the individual state governments. With the individual state gaining more power, the national government found it extremely......

Words: 1174 - Pages: 5

The Constitution

...The document I chose to write about is the United States Constitution. When the thirteen British colonies in North America declared their independence in 1776, they laid down that “governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” The “colonies” had to establish a government, which would be the framework for the United States. The purpose of a written constitution is to define and therefore more specifically limit government powers. After the Articles of Confederation failed to work in the 13 colonies, the U.S. Constitution was created in 1787. The Constitution is important because it was expressly designed to limit powers into three co-ordinate branches, the legislative, executive, and judiciary branch; none of which was to have supremacy over the others. This separation of powers with the checks and balances which each branch was given over the others was designed to prevent any branch, from infringing individual liberties safeguarded by the Constitution. I think the U.S. Constitution was a way for the U.S. to establish government which was a negotiation between the two former governments, a monarchy and total state power. I think by creating the checks and balances, people’s rights would be safer and they would feel more secure not having one branch of government with absolute power. What I found most interesting about the Constitution was how complex and detailed the framers made it, to effectively explain and limit...

Words: 435 - Pages: 2

Constitution

...Question-01: The Constitution declares that the sovereignty lies with the people and constitution is the embodiment and solemn expression of the will of the people? 1.0 Introduction: Do we have a right to hold opinions that differ from others? Can we write and publish what we think? Can we protest to your government if we disapprove of its policies? Can the government search and seize our property? Can we be arrested and held without trial? Can the government treat us differently than it treats other people? Every country is based on some kind of law. Some of those are arbitrary powers, however over the years the only rule that seems to dictate the terms is the rule of law. As a citizen, we must know our constitutional rights in order to assert them. One of the basic principles of the any constitution is the rule of law.Actually sustainable development and good governance mostly depends on the proper application of rule of law. Laws are made for the welfare of the people, to bring a balance in society, a harmony between the conflicting forces in society. One of the prime objects of making constitution is to maintain law and order in society, a peaceful environment for the progress of the people. 2.0 Sovereignty of the people: Today, most modern states have followed written and fixed constitutions. A constitution presupposes the universe of a constituent power, as distinguished from other constituted powers, created by the constitution itself. Constitution is the......

Words: 3408 - Pages: 14

Vedi Prodotto | SiMontok 1.9 | Shin ken fansub