Criminal vs Civil

In: Other Topics

Submitted By erbentraut
Words 756
Pages 4
Criminal Law vs. Civil Law
There are numerous differences between criminal and civil law. Criminal law is defined as a body of rules and statutes that defines conduct prohibited by the government because it threatens and harms public safety and welfare and that establishes punishment to be imposed for the commission of such acts. (The Free Dictionary by Farlex) Civil law is defined as the body of laws of a state or nation dealing with the rights of private citizens. (The Free Dictionary by Farlex)
In an attempt to explain the difference, you must first understand criminal law. Criminal laws are substantive and divided into categories of misdemeanors and felonies. The primary difference between misdemeanor and felony is the distinct punishments and issues regarding severity. In general, a misdemeanor is a violation of a meager crime. Misdemeanors typically do not involve violent actions or crimes that cause great harm to a society. Common forms of misdemeanors include: resisting arrest, simple battery, shoplifting, public intoxication, and in some states possession and use of marijuana. In contrast, a felony is a serious crime, such as rape, murder, kidnapping, grand theft auto, or assault with a deadly weapon. Convicted felons will undoubtedly face jail time. The Federal Government states that a felony is any act that carries a minimum one-year prison sentence (Difference Between a Misdemeanor and Felony). In criminal law and with criminal court the prosecution is always the state or body of government.
A major difference between criminal and civil is the punishments. In a criminal court if you are found guilty, the punishments are incarceration and/or punitive damages. In contrast, there is never incarceration in civil law. In civil court In a civil case, there is a possibility of punitive damages, if the defendant's conduct is egregious and had either…...

Similar Documents

Criminal Law and Civil Law

...describing what criminal law means that the society is protected thru this laws and the violation of this laws by any person will result in imprisonment or fines. The fines or time of imprisonment for the violator of the law will depend on the grade of the law broken. Criminal laws are made to protect everybody in the society, and to prevent crimes from happening. To give an example of a criminal law that has been broken could be a murder. If somebody kills another person to rob him or just make danger then this person will be prosecuted for violating a criminal law. Civil laws are a bit different from criminal laws because they are created to compensate the persons or entity when they have been affected by the broken law of another person. For example if someone crashed their car into a house then this person should pay the homeowner for the damages and to repair it. Also in the civil laws business are cover and if somebody do something to affect a company then they are breaking a civil law. These laws is mainly created to protect not only the people’s properties but to protect business. Both of these laws are somewhat easy to understand because they clearly state what they mean and what are they for. Both of these topics can be applied in my line of work in any type of situation, for example if working in the dealership a crash a car into a property then the civil law will be applied on me and if a kill someone with this crash I can be prosecuted for breaking a criminal......

Words: 279 - Pages: 2

Civil V. Criminal

...Civil actions and criminal actions are both handled in a court of law, but they don’t carry the same kinds of penalties. Civil actions are the kind of court cases that usually involve the damage to a plaintiff’s property, or physical injuries that are a result of misconduct by the defendant. Civil actions usually don’t require either party to have lawyers present, and can be handled in a single visit to court rather than repeat visits and appeals. Criminal actions on the other hand are much more complicated, and will involve lawyers who are either court appointed or obtained by the defendant themselves. Criminal action is brought on by the state, and will involve a defendant who has committed a crime that ranges from a simple assault, robbery, OUI, attempted murder, or the death of another. The goal of all civil cases it to reach an agreement, or try and make right of a situation that has lead both parties to court. A Civil case allows both the plaintiff and defendant to state their case, it’s also is a chance for the plaintiff to be compensated for any money or property they are owed. The goal of all criminal cases is for the state to hand down forms of punishment to those who have broken the law. Criminal cases also give the public a sense of security, knowing that the people who have committed a violent or reckless crime will be held accountable, and punished based on the nature of the crime. Civil cases don’t involve any kind of incarceration, but do involve the......

Words: 701 - Pages: 3

Civil V. Criminal

...Quite simply, criminal law deals with violations of statutory crime and its punishment, civil law deals with non-criminal things such as contracts/business, and things such as divorce, etc. You can be charged under both criminal and civil proceedings though. A perfect example is OJ Simpson being aquitted of criminal charges but being found guilty in civil proceedings. Probably the biggest difference between the two is what is called "BURDEN OF PROOF" In criminal proceedings the burden is "BEYOND ALL REASONABLE DOUBT" for someone to be convicted. This means that the evidence points substantially towards guilt and there is little to no question of guilt. For a jury in this case you would need everyone in agreement or the case is a mistrial. Unaminity is the key. In civil proceedings all that is required is "preponderance of evidence" which means that if it is found that it was more likely than not that an incident occured then you can be convicted. This kind of proceeding is really a "who has the best evidence" type of case. Only a majority of jury members decision is needed in this case. 1. Criminal Law cases must prove the person's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, whilst civil cases must be proved on the balance of probability 2. The main difference however is who the law is aimed at. Theoretically criminal law is a considered to be harming all members of society. Consequently, the victim of the criminal case is all of society; hence the case is brought on...

Words: 515 - Pages: 3

The Chinese Civil War : Kmt vs. Ccp

...The Chinese Civil War KMT vs. CCP The Chinese civil war of 1946-49, is considered one of the most brutal and bloody conflicts near the final stages of the Second World War, which took the lives of millions of soldiers and civilians. The war was fought between two parties, the Kuomintang (KMT or Nationalists) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP or Reds). The leaders of these parties respectively were Chiang Kai-shek and Mao Zedong. The war between the KMT and CCP wasn’t a new struggle but a continuation that dates back more than a couple decades and resumes after the Japanese had surrendered in 1945. In 1949, the better armed KMT were ultimately defeated by the CCP. The reasons for the CCP’s decisive victory are due to the poor mismanagements of Chiang Kai-shek combined with the corruption of the KMT, the superior leadership and tactics of Mao Zedong and the communists, the positive support from the peasants, and the aid provided by the Soviet Union. Although Chiang and his Nationalists looked like they had all the advantages over the CCP at the end of the Japanese war, Chiang’s leadership and the corruption of officers in the KMT’s forces known as the “Nationalist Revolutionary Army” (NRA), would be a major cause in the KMT’s defeat. One of Chiang’s military goals was to be the head of a national army that would heed all of his orders which was never fully accomplished. Throughout the civil war, the armies he controlled were a mixed bag. There......

Words: 1390 - Pages: 6

Law, Tort Law, Criminal Law, Contracts, and Civil Procedure

...Running head: Law, Tort Law, Criminal Law, Contracts, and Civil Procedure | | | Law, Tort Law, Criminal Law, Contracts, and Civil Procedure In defining the term law, tort law, criminal law, contract and the sources from which law derives, I will use a case that took place in 1929 “Donoghue v Stevenson” to demonstrate the these laws which will show a successful negligence suit, as well as defenses a defendant presenting evidence to refute a plaintiffs evidence. J.G. Holland said it best! In the words of J. G. Holland “Laws are the very bulwarks of liberty; they define every man’s rights, and defend the individual liberties of all men”. Laws are derived from the United States Constitution; Constitutional law is the body of law which defines the relationship of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the legislature and the judiciary. Established Constitutional and administrative law govern the affairs of the state. Constitutional law concerns both the relationships between the executive, legislature and judiciary and the human rights or civil liberties of individuals against the state. Most jurisdictions, like the United States and France, have a single codified constitution with a bill of rights. A few, like the United Kingdom, have no such document. A "constitution" is simply those laws which constitute the body politic, from statute, case law and convention. Law is defined as a system of......

Words: 1720 - Pages: 7

Gobierno vs Parlamento: Guerra Civil de 1891 En Chile.

...Gobierno vs Parlamento: Guerra civil de 1891. 21/11/2011 Víctor Espinosa Loyola. Gobierno vs Parlamento: Guerra civil de 1891. Un hecho que sin lugar a dudas ha marcado la historia chilena, es el conflicto armado que se produjo entre el Gobierno del entonces Presidente de la República José Manuel Balmaceda que fue apoyado por el ejercito de Chile, y el Parlamento aristocrático que fue apoyado por la marina. Este conflicto se denomina como la “Guerra Civil de 1891”, en donde ambos bandos se disputaban el poder y autoridad política de Chile, debido a “la negativa por parte del Congreso de aprobar la Ley de presupuesto de ese año. Balmaceda aprueba de facto la ley del año anterior y se declara como única autoridad. El 7 de enero de 1891, las fuerzas navales, apoyada por las fuerzas congresistas, se sublevó, dando comienzo a la guerra civil.” (1)  Pero, ¿a que llamamos guerra civil? Según Definicion.de: “Una Guerra Civil es un combate, batalla, lucha, pelea o enfrentamiento que involucra a los habitantes de un mismo pueblo o país. En estos casos, no hay injerencia directa de otros países.”  Entonces,...

Words: 2301 - Pages: 10

Civil and Criminal Cases

...Running head: CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES Civil and Criminal Cases Lawanda Hall Kaplan University PA 101: The Paralegal Professional David Bondanza There are many distinctions between civil and criminal cases. There are also many differences in the way these cases are handled. In order for us to understand them, we must first know and understand what they are. Civil law deals with the disputes between individuals, organizations, or between the two, in which compensation is awarded to the victim. In a civil case the plaintiff can be an individual, corporation or government agency. Criminal law is the body of law that deals with crime and the legal punishment of criminal offenses. A criminal case is intended to accomplish this by providing an incentive for persons to act reasonably in society and imposing penalties on persons who violate those (Goldman & Cheeseman). At the beginning of a federal criminal case, the main characters are the U.S. attorney (the prosecutor) and the grand jury. The U.S. attorney represents the United States in most court proceedings, including all criminal prosecutions. The grand jury reviews evidence presented by the U.S. attorney and decides whether there is sufficient evidence to require a defendant to stand trial. According to William Geldart, "The difference between civil law and criminal law turns on the difference between two different objects which law seeks to......

Words: 917 - Pages: 4

Room vs. Lullabies for Little Criminals

...Lullabies for Little Criminals written by Heather O’Neill and Room written by Emma Donoghue, the young protagonists, Jack and Baby, suffer through experiences that not many children go through and have to overcome their horrific pasts in order to transition into a better future. At times, Jack and Baby’s probability for success seems unlikely as their bright futures are dimmed but, both manage to prove themselves against all of the stereotypical remarks directed towards them, and progress past all of their original obstacles. Both characters also lack a true home; but, what they lack in environment, they gain through the relationships they develop with their family members. While neither child belongs to a set social class, both often find themselves alienated from others; this leads them to discover their true identities. Unfortunately horrific traumas are experienced by each protagonist, but this leads them to evolve into tougher individuals and gain courage within themselves. When a child is raised in economically poor and unstable conditions it is often believed that the child’s growth will be affected in a negative manner; however these two novels prove that experiences that arise from instability actually produces a more self-enlightened person. A proper living environment can feed a child’s growth as they learn and mature in a healthy and stable home; however, this factor of a healthy living environment is absent from Baby’s life. In Lullabies for Little Criminals,......

Words: 2138 - Pages: 9

Adversary System vs, Civil Law Method

...ADVERSARY SYSTEM vs. CIVIL LAW METHOD   “The goal of both the adversarial system and the inquisitorial system is to find the truth. But the adversarial system seeks the truth by pitting the parties against each other in the hope that competition will reveal it, whereas the inquisitorial system seeks the truth by questioning those most familiar with the events in dispute. The adversarial system places a premium on the individual rights of the accused, whereas the inquisitorial system places the rights of the accused secondary to the search for truth.” This, taken from a website I found on a comparison of the adversary system vs. the inquisitorial (or civil) system of justice. By definition, theadversary system isthe system of law that relies on the contest between each advocate representing his or her party's positions to an impartial person or group of people, usually a jury or judge, trying to determine the truth of the case. By contrast, in the inquisitorial system, the judgeactively steers the search for evidence and questions the witnesses, including the respondent or defendant. Attorneys play a more passive role, suggesting routes of inquiry for the presiding judge and following the judge's questioning with questions of their own. The questioning done by the attorney is often brief because the judge tries to ask all relevant questions. With the adversarial system of law, the side with the “best case” or best presentation to the court usually prevails. During this......

Words: 971 - Pages: 4

Should a Business Have Civil Liability for the Criminal Acts of Its Employees?

...Should A Business Have Civil Liability for the Criminal Acts of Its Employees? A business should have civil liability for the criminal acts of its employees when the criminal acts are done in connection with the employee performing work for the company. This includes acts that were both known and unknown by the employer. Vicarious liability and respondeat superior are two large factors in businesses being liable for their employees, and it is vital to understand what does and doesn’t fall under these doctrines. Businesses have a duty of care to hire, train, supervise, and retain employees that are responsible and ethical members of society; if an employee commits a criminal act while representing the business, then the employer has breached its duty of care. Employees represent the business they work for, and a business reaps benefits of its employees as far as sales and goodwill are considered, therefore the business should be held responsible for its employee’s acts because the employee is acting on behalf of the business (“Defining an employer’s duty of care,” n.d.). There are a few key reasons that a business should have civil liability for the criminal acts of its employees. Imposing liability on a business may give it an incentive to invest in higher standards for hiring, supervision, and retention of its employees to prevent these crimes from occurring. From a firm’s standpoint, it is much more favorable investing in the hiring and training of employees......

Words: 1308 - Pages: 6

Criminal and Civil Law

...Between the Criminal and Civil Justice Systems? There are two different types of court systems: criminal and civil. There are vast differences between the two systems, including different types of punishments, laws, and burdens of proof. While the two systems are usually separate, there are some situations where they seem to overlap, such as wrongful death cases and cases involving police misconduct. How Does Each System Work? The first difference that should be noted is that in the criminal system, the government (either state or federal) seeks to punish a person for violating rules that have been set by a state legislature or Congress. In the civil system, there is usually a dispute between individuals or organizations as to rights and/or duties that they owe each other. In the civil system, the injured party starts things by bringing a suit. On the other hand, a prosecutor can bring a criminal case regardless of the victim¿s wishes. What Punishment are Available in Each System? In the criminal system, if you are convicted you could face fines, probation, and jail time. If you are found to be liable in a civil case, you face possible monetary damages and you may be forced to give up property. But, you will never face jail time in a civil case. Also, it should be noted that one of the purposes of the criminal system is to stigmatize an individual, unlike the civil system. What about the Burden of Proof? The burden of proof is higher in criminal cases. For a criminal......

Words: 438 - Pages: 2

Criminal vs. Racial Profiling

...Racial profiling is not the same thing as criminal profiling. Racial profiling is any police-initiated action that relies on the race, ethnicity, or national orgin rather than the behavior of an individual or information that leads the police to a particular individual who has been identified as being. or having been, engaged in criminal activity. Criminal profiling is any police- initiated action that used the compilation of the background, physical, behavioral, and motivational characteristics for a type of perpretrator that lead the police. Racial profiling does not only violate constitutional rights, but is also ineffective if used in policing. The major reason to oppose racial profiling (aside from constitutional and moral grounds) is that it simply doesn’t work. Empirical studies show that when police use race or ethnic appearance as a factor in law enforcement, their effectiveness in apprehending criminals decreases. Even worse, it has often led to “accidental” deaths, such as the fatal shootings of African American and Latino men. On the other hand, criminal profiling is effective when applied to policing. Profiling units examine criminal behaviour to discover the characteristics of the offender and the causes of their crimes. Profilers look at three areas of the criminal’s behaviour: verbal, physical, and sexual interaction with victims. To create a criminal profile, profilers consider statistics, basic psychological principles, crime scene behaviour,......

Words: 498 - Pages: 2

Civil Procedure V. Criminal Procedure

...Civil Procedure v. Criminal Procedure ENC 1102 34 Week 11 Individual Work Civil Procedure v. Criminal Procedure Civil procedure relates to the process where two parties bring a case to the court for a decision on a particular problem. These problems can include but are not limited to divorces, estate distribution, work men’s comp., injury cases, or even matters such as discrimination in the workplace. Criminal procedure applies to the process where the state or federal government is charging and trying someone for a crime that was committed (Civil Procedure, 2012). The rules in civil procedure are different than those in criminal procedure because the actions that need to be taken are different. Firstly, civil procedure requires that a civil case must begin by filing a complaint. The complaint is then, served to the offending party. Once the defending party receives the complaint, they then drafts and files an answer with the court. A party in a civil case can be anyone including people, businesses, and government personnel. When the parties go in front of the court in a civil case, it is to determine whether a person was injured and if they were injured, how much should be compensated for that injury. All of this information pertaining to the civil case is specifically drafted into the court documents (American Bar, 2012). Civil cases, also, have some Constitutional protection in place. For example, the parties involved in a case must file and receive consent of......

Words: 940 - Pages: 4

Civil and Criminal Penalties for Embezzlement

...Embezzlement is a serious crime that carries penalties in both the civil and criminal court systems. When you embezzle money or property from a company, you should know that you are taking serious risks. Essentially, embezzlement occurs when a person or persons in a company receive money or property because they've been given a certain degree of trust. As you can tell, the law is quite vague on this particular crime. As with many criminal offenses, the civil penalties are just as stiff as the criminal ones, though you cannot be given jail time at the ruling of a civil court judge. In most cases, offenders face criminal charges first, then move on to civil court afterward so that the company can reclaim what it lost. In other words, you'll likely be in jail with no money for the commissary. When you commit the crime of embezzlement, the strongest evidence against you will likely be a paper trail that leads directly from you to the missing money or assets. This often occurs because the person charged is the only individual with access to the funds, and thus becomes the prime suspect by the process of elimination. If no one else could have done it, in other words, you're the guilty party. In the criminal court system, the penalties for embezzlement usually include a jail sentence and a fine, both of which can be substantial. The United States Code, Title 18, deals with all forms of embezzlement, of which there are many. The sentence you receive will depend on the nature......

Words: 470 - Pages: 2

Civil and Criminal Procedures

...Civil and Criminal Procedures–LEG 110 Define a Family. A family is a group of people who share are joined by blood, marriage, or adoption. It is also a group of people residing together consisting of parents, children, and other relatives by blood or marriage. Finally, a family is a group of people residing together who have consented to an arrangement similarly to those of blood or marriage. Explain What Constitutes a Marriage. Marriage is a legitimate contract between a man and a woman who mutually promise to live together in a relationship in law for life, or until the legal termination of their relationship. Once both parties have entered into a marriage contract, the legal status of both parties will have changed giving the husband and wife new rights obligations and benefits. Public policy is intensely in favor of the institution of marriage. Conventionally, marriage has been viewed as vital to the preservation of morals and is believed to sustain the family unit in our civilization. In the United States, marriage is regulated by individual states. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that states are permitted to reasonably regulate marriage by stipulating who can marry and the method in which they can dissolve a marriage. All states limit people to one living husband or wife at a time, and will not issue a marriage licenses to anyone who has not divorced a living spouse. Once someone is married, the only way they can be legally liberated from his or her spouse...

Words: 1478 - Pages: 6

Watch movie | Baixar APK | Senran Kagura Shinovi Master: Tokyo Youma-hen ตอนที่ 1 - 6 ซับไทย