Ethics of Gun Manufacturers

In: Social Issues

Submitted By Breaker6543
Words 1238
Pages 5
Jacob Davis
Prof. Michael Leeds
BIS 221 - Mon 5:30

Ethics of Gun Manufactures

Guns have long been a staple of the American dream. The U.S. far surpasses the rest of the world in guns owned per capita, not to mention the amount of revenue generated from arms manufacturing, which helped cultivate one of the largest economies in the world.(Rabkin, 143) Recent shootings such as Sandy Hook Elementary in Newton, Connecticut have sparked large debate between politicians and citizens over gun rights. Although there are many tangents to discuss about gun rights the questions remains, are gun manufactures morally responsible for the harm caused by their products, or does the responsibility lie in those who purchase them? As long as the product is not defective, I will argue the accountability falls not on the manufacture, but instead to the gun purchaser, for two reasons, liability and education.
Is it ethical for the manufacture of a product to be liable if their product is in fact not defective (functions as it should), but is used criminally by another. Gun manufacturers feel that they do act responsibly. The manufacturers sell only to distributors and dealers who have FFL (Federal Firearms License) issued by the U.S. government for the purpose of firearm commerce. The dealers maintain they cannot be held responsible for legal sale to an individual who in turn disposes of the firearm to a disqualified person, or if legal sale results in a crime down the road due to a theft from the rightful owner.
Currently because of Senate bill #S. 397 (Protection of lawful Commerce in Arms Act) which passed in 2005, manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition are immune from civil liability for damages resulting from misuse by others. It effectively closes the courthouse doors to an entire class of defendants, victims of gun violence. Not…...

Similar Documents

Gun Control

...Gun Control     Gun Control in the United States is a topic that many people are discussing on the news or in private. The mass shootings at the Aurora movie theater that claimed the lives of 12 and injured 59-plus the recent mass shooting at the elementary school in Newton, Connecticut that claimed the life’s of 20 children and six adults. These shootings have stirred up the old debate about gun control and what the second amendment is and what it means to people. Politicians, including President Obama have claimed to create new laws that will reduce the gun violence in this country. Laws that include an assault weapons ban, background checks, in an attempt to keep guns out of the hands of people who may hurt someone or themselves. The opposition has claimed that some of these laws will violate their second amendment right to bear arms and are fighting against any new gun control measures. There are good potential outcomes of gun control and outcomes that might have a negative impact on citizens.     A form of gun control that was law but failed to pass again is the ban on assault rifles. The ban on assault rifles will take those types of guns out of people who might do others harm. Most of the mass shooting that happened in 2012 didn’t involve assault rifles like the AR-15 but hand-guns. Along with the ban on assault rifles there will be tougher laws that will allow faster tracking of weapons. The new background checks and the electronic data of all sales of weapons and......

Words: 1992 - Pages: 8


...current gun laws should not be made more strict because ,gun control laws only keeps ‘the good guys from purchasing firearms, bad guys will always have ways of getting weapons , whether it be from the black market , across borders or even on the street; new gun laws won’t do much in stopping them; and no legitimate study in the us has ever shown that gun control has any positive impact on crimeThree robbers entered a Commerce City, Colo., residence, one of them pulled a knife, according to officials. The two men and a woman apparently had planned to rob an acquaintance: but the homeowner resisted the threat, drawing his semiautomatic handgun and shooting the two men. After the three fled, they called for medical help from a cousin's house. The police followed shortly thereafter. "As soon as they get out of the hospital, we'll be there to meet and greet them," said Sgt. Craig Coleman of the Adams County Sheriff's Dept.These are two of many different stories that are produced monthly by the magazine American Rifleman. Every issue gives 4 to 7 stories on how handgun's save lives everyday. There are many people who believe that a handgun can save your life, but there also people who believe that they are just used for bad guys to kill. The Constitution states that we have the right to keep and bare arms, but there are some groups that have decided that is not right. They will do whatever it takes to change Amendment 2. GOLDBERG, J. (2012). THE CASE FOR MORE Guns (AND MORE GUN......

Words: 1721 - Pages: 7


...hydrocarbons, managing geological data, drilling and formation evaluations, to well construction and completion. There are two divisions that make up Halliburton. They are: Drilling and Evaluating and Completion and Production. These two divisions accounted for 18 billion dollars in revenue in 2008. Halliburton employees more than 50,000 people in approximately 70 countries and offer two major business segments. The Energy Services Group provides the technical products and services for fuel exploration and production, and (KBR) Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. KBR is a construction company that has refineries, pipelines and chemical plants. This paper will cover the various methods of Halliburton’s planning functions of management, legal issues, ethics, and corporate social responsibility. The paper will also explain three factors that influence Halliburton’s strategic, tactical, operational, and contingency planning. Planning Functions of Management As planning is an important function of management, it allows an organization to achieve its maximum potential. The planning function is a methodical approach for taking the goal and turning them into plans and strategies. An example of a planning function that Halliburton utilize is Knowledge Management, which is processes, tools, and behaviors that are deliver the correct content to the correct people at the exact time needed and in the correct context so that they can make the best decisions possible for the business, and......

Words: 283 - Pages: 2

Malaysian Manufacturers

...companies worldwide face a hard time. In Malaysia, KLSE is going down [4] and this give the hardest hit ever to most companies in Malaysia and investors. Moreover, demands for export are almost disappear and this affects the manufacturing sector in Malaysia. Currently, some manufacturers are reducing their manufacturing volume and capacity and this cause a lot of people become jobless. Now is a very tough for everyone. Besides, the manufacturing sector in Malaysia also has a problem in maintaining its competitiveness, quality and Just-In-Time delivery [1]. This is because all three requirements mentioned before is crucial in order to gain market share. Nowadays, some manufacturers will outsource their production in order to maintain competitiveness. Some fields that are widely outsourced in Malaysia are contract manufacturing, logistics and IT services, internal audit and R&D [1]. From [1], it is stated that Malaysian manufacturers face some problems during the shipment of their products. One of them is due to the sets of physical examinations that their products need to go through before entering a particular country. As a result, these examinations will cause delay. Other that, there are some manufacturers those need to do export-direct for their product. To fulfill this need, Malaysia’s government should develop a cargo consolidation facility and services. Moreover, because of more than one system of Approving and Inspection Authorities take place, a......

Words: 2199 - Pages: 9


...Gun Control- Pro Gun control is the control of firearms so that crime will go down. Roughly 16,272 murders were committed in the United States during 2008. Most of these, 67 percent or 10,886 were committed with firearms. Even though people have the right to bear arms, as said in The Bill of Rights, there should be laws in place to limit the amount and types of firearms people can own. ( Crime rates in the United States are way too high with most crimes such as robberies, assaults, and murders being committed with a gun. Kids have easy access to most guns that are in the house because they are not properly locked away. Kids may be interested in how the gun works and do not properly know how to use it. Some sort of accident happens where it fires and possibly kills someone . In 1994 Governor Weld of Massachusetts signed a law that banned handguns for anyone under the age of 21.The crime rate in Boston decreased . There needs to be laws in place to restrict the availability and types of guns that are legal to regular citizens. ( Gun Control relates to governmental issues because of the 2nd Amendment in the Constitution. There are two Principles of Democracy that gun control directly is related to, first is Individual Rights and Freedoms because it is a persons right to own any firearm that they so please. It also involves Limited Government. Many people will argue that people have the 2nd Amendment......

Words: 453 - Pages: 2

Ethics and Gun Control

...When it comes to conducting business, one should always do so with the utmost care. Not only are your actions and the way you hold yourself going to be under the microscope, but so are your words. GM’s failure of providing quality service and cars that actually murdered people is a gross example of how a company’s negligence can hurt others. They allowed these cars, hundreds of models from their company, to be sold and ridden in despite the fact that they were unsure about the faulty parts put into their cars. If a business is going to appeal to the general public then they have to be a business that is willing to provide a service that does not endanger the lives of their buyers. It is just that simple. So even after so much was lost, a company has to work on cleaning up after themselves. So to learn that their lawsuits were pretty much set on whether or not the victim qualified was just messed up (Grier, 2014) . If someone has a faulty car, if someone’s loved one died in that car and yet they have to prove that they have been wronged, it just seems backwards. Almost like their pain is not good enough to have a price on it. After speaking with the others, it just becomes scary to know that GM and other companies like it would sooner throw their own customers under the bus rather than spend a few extra thousand to ensure that their vehicles are being put together properly. Even Toyota went through the inner struggle of not knowing whether or not they could go through......

Words: 434 - Pages: 2


...Reflection Joe Nocera argues in his New York Times op-ed column “Guns and Mental Illness” that it should be more difficult for people, rather than the mentally-ill, to attain a firearm due to a recent mass shooting in California. Last month, 22-year-old Elliot Rodger went on a shooting spree in Isla Vista, California after emailing a 140-page manifesto to his parents. Nocera recapitulates the terrifying tale of two parents racing to California only to have their worst fears confirmed: Elliot had killed six people before committing suicide from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Elliot had a long history with depression and had never been admitted to a psychiatric facility. It is unclear whether Elliot should have been admitted to a psychiatric clinic. In particular, Elliot did not have a criminal history. He was simply a sequestered adolescent with poor social skills. In other words, Elliot had a right to purchase a gun. Mass shooters tend to meet the profile of socially awkward males. Statistically, however, very few socially awkward males actually commit mass shootings. It would be unlawful to deny males who meet this profile access to a firearm. Indeed, Nocera notes that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1975 that mentally-ill people who are neither violent nor dangerous cannot be forced into an institution. Therefore, Nocera concludes that we should make it more difficult for everyone to attain a gun. The author has a clear liberal bias. The......

Words: 648 - Pages: 3

Ethics for Firearms Manufacturers

...“Ethics” has at least three uses potentially relevant here. First, it can be a synonym for ordinary morality, those standards of conduct that apply to all moral agents simply because they are moral agents—“Don’t kill”, “Keep your promises”, “Help the needy”, and so on. Second, “ethics” can refer to those morally binding standards that apply to members of a group simply because they are members of that group. Legal ethics applies to lawyers and no one else; business ethics to people in business and no one else; and so on. Third, “ethics” can refer to a field of philosophy, that is, the attempt to understand morality (including its special standards) as part of a reasonable undertaking. Other names for “ethics” in this third sense include “moral theory” and “ethical theory”. I shall hereafter reserve “ethics” for the special-standards sense, using “morality” for the first sense and “moral theory” for the third. Given this terminology, some “ethical issues” identified in the call for our conference seem in part moral (whether or not they are also ethical, that is, whether or not they concern an 4 existing special standard or might lead to the adoption of such a standard). For example, the threat drones pose to people’s privacy is a moral issue.3 Every moral agent, even the agents of the global arms industry, should, all else equal, avoid contributing to the invasion of people’s privacy. Other issues, such as what to do about “government officials [who] expect some form of quid......

Words: 1388 - Pages: 6

Gun Control

...Alexander Welch Personal Value & Ethics Professor Sandra White September 22, 2015 Week 5 On this day in the US, around thirty people will be killed with a gun, not including suicides.  Many more will be wounded.  I can safely predict this number because that is the average number of homicides committed with a gun in the US each day.  Such killings have become so routine that they are barely noticed even in the local news.  Only when a significant number of people are murdered, particularly when they include children or are killed randomly, is the event considered newsworthy. Yet efforts to regulate the possession of guns in the US are consistently defeated. The case for gun rights rests primarily on two claims, one about facts, the other about moral principle.  The claim about fact is that members of society as a whole are safer when more of them have guns, since potential aggressors are likelier to be deterred the more reasonable it is for them to believe that their potential victim is armed.  The claim about principle is that each person has a right of self-defense and that this right entails a further right not to be deprived of, or prevented from having, the most effective means of self-defense.  These claims are independent.  Most of those who assert them think the second would be true even if the first were false. Advocates of gun rights usually defend the claim about fact by appealing to statistics for example, those that suggest that when a......

Words: 1714 - Pages: 7

Gun Control

...Jump to main content Jump to navigation the WHITE HOUSEPRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA Contact UsGet Email Updates Home BRIEFING ROOM ISSUES THE ADMINISTRATION PARTICIPATE 1600 PENN Search form Search Search You are here HOMEBRIEFING ROOMSPEECHES & REMARKS Briefing Room Your Weekly Address Speeches & Remarks Press Briefings Statements & Releases White House Schedule Presidential Actions Executive Orders Presidential Memoranda Proclamations Legislation Pending Legislation Signed Legislation Vetoed Legislation Nominations & Appointments Disclosures The White House Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate ReleaseJanuary 05, 2016 Remarks by the President on Common-Sense Gun Safety Reform East Room 11:43 A.M. EST THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. (Applause.) Thank you. Thank you, everybody. Please have a seat. Thank you. (Applause.) Thank you so much. Mark, I want to thank you for your introduction. I still remember the first time we met, the time we spent together, and the conversation we had about Daniel. And that changed me that day. And my hope, earnestly, has been that it would change the country. Five years ago this week, a sitting member of Congress and 18 others were shot at, at a supermarket in Tucson, Arizona. It wasn’t the first time I had to talk to the nation in response to a mass shooting, nor would it be the last. Fort Hood. Binghamton. Aurora. Oak Creek. Newtown. The Navy Yard. Santa Barbara. Charleston. ......

Words: 4196 - Pages: 17

Gun Control

...Second Amendment in the Constitution, the citizens have the right to possess and bear arms. But, this has remained an important issue since decades. Issues such as gun control and gun rights have remained a matter of debate and have been lobbying around in the Congress meetings. It has been depicted that the Congress is forced to draft a specific legislation in order to come up with a strict law against unlawful use of arms, and only possessing them for safety purpose. The following paper gun control and gun rights in the United States of America; I want to talk about the economy, necessity, and legitimate use. Due to unfortunate and very violent gun crimes involving deadly shootings, recent action by the Federal Government has acted to begin serious debate and possible reform in support of major gun control laws. Several enactments such as a ban on assault rifles, and a ban on regular and extended magazine clips have been a huge topic of debate. Such reform can have a huge affect on businesses and the United States economy. Recently there has been a great surge in sales and revenue for gun manufacturers and firearm store-fronts and businesses as spooked consumers fear stiff gun control laws are soon to come. However, if a firearm ban is to be the final result of government gun reform, these same manufacturers and store-fronts will most likely close their doors for good. According to the National Sports Shooting Foundation, the firearm industry is responsible for......

Words: 657 - Pages: 3

Manufacturer Workers manufacturing is slowly decreasing in the United States due to improvement in research and technologies. Manufacturing companies are looking for ways to increase efficiency and effectiveness by introducing and using machines in place of workers. By moving towards computerized machines promotes speed and accuracy as they are more consistent and most likely faster than what a worker can perform at. Having more advanced technologies encourages jobs to be more specialized and requires higher skills than simple manual labour. Employees would have to require more knowledge and constantly educating themselves in the new processes. Also due to rising competition in the industries, competitive prices are lowered and profits are decreasing. Manufacturers find alternate ways to cut cost in order to gain the loss potential profit by going to countries with low labour cost such as China and Mexico to develop their goods. This creates a lot of jobs for those countries but at the same time, cuts back the employment in the United States. Government officials should be concern about the loss in manufacturing jobs. The majority of these jobs consist of the generation of baby boomers who learned one type of skill. When unemployed, these workers would need to be retrained in order to go back into the work force again. With unemployment, there is a loss in potential GDP for the country that could have been made with the people who stand idle without a job. For business leaders, they are......

Words: 319 - Pages: 2


...Statistics show that violence related to guns is the second-leading cause of teenage and young adult death in industrialized areas (Murnan, J., Dake, J A, & Price, J H 2004). What they don’t tell is the statistics for the amount of self defense and other non-violent cases are involved. Moorhouse and Wanner state that the rate of gun related homicide is over 50 percent but the variable to what the cause of the homicide is not present (Moorhouse and Wanner, 2006). FBI releases a report that gives these types of statistics, but they don’t tell you are the opposite of these. The amount of guns owned by Americans has increased 51% over the past two years, with this the total violent crime has decreased 21%, the murder has decreased 28%, the amount of robberies has decreased 43%, and the amount of aggravated assaults have decreased 13% (National Rifle Association, 2008). Even though most homicidal violence is caused by firearms, not all deaths are related to the misuse of firearms. Which is why I don't believe that it is fair to take people’s right to bear arms because it is a constitutional right as well as personal protection. Every family has at least one member that owns a firearm of some sort based on statistics. Some are used for sport and some for protection. I believe the biggest role of a firearm is personal protection. According to the National Rifle Association 76% of all Americans fall victim to some sort of violent crime at least once in their lifetimes......

Words: 1639 - Pages: 7

Gun Control

...Gun Control Anthony D. Torres COM 220 August 5th, 2012 Mary Trapasso Does gun control affect the way we live? Every year, in the United States, there are over thirty thousand deaths attributed to gun violence. Gun control and its laws are designed to save lives while ensuring a safer and more civilized society. Although these laws do nothing to prevent crimes; they are in place to ensure that those who violate them are punished and removed from society, thereby preventing future crimes.  Supporters and opponents of gun control agree guns should be kept out of the hands of criminals. The ability for people to use a firearm while defending themselves from harm or possible death at the hands of a criminal is not debatable, it is a Constitutional Right. Gun control laws save lives and continue to have positive effects within our nation. The Second Amendment in the US Constitution grants law abiding citizens the right to own a gun for self-defense. The amendment states that “a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Find Law, 2012). Even though it is a right to bear arms, the purchase of firearms has become more difficult and almost impossible for people with criminal backgrounds. Those with felony convictions, fugitives from justice, dishonorably discharged from the military, illegal aliens in the United States, convicted of domestic violence, and people who possess......

Words: 1946 - Pages: 8


...A Rebuttal of Gun Control What would be going through your mind if you were at your barber and a deranged man came in and began pointing a gun at others and you. You have your 5 year old son with you? Would you be thinking if they would ban guns this would have never happened? Probably not! What you were probably thinking is if I had a gun on me I could protect not only my own lift but also my sons life and the people around me. People are starting to see a gun as an object of death and destruction, and not what they are intended to be. There is a major debate going on in the U.S. on gun control. Should people have the right to carry a concealed weapon or should they only be allowed to have a gun in their home? Another question is if the government were to ban guns would that be doing us law-abiding citizens more harm than good? Or maybe they should only allow guns in the hands of people that have had background checks and our licensed to handle them. “Guns are a part of America’s way of life. Today many people are under the impression that guns are the root of all that is evil.” (Patton, 2011). Who would be the person that would save a lady that was being raped? Probably someone who owns a gun and its use is not intended for evil, or what about someone that is breaking into your home? Who is the person that will save the day? Once again probably someone who owns a gun and it is not intended for the use of evil but more for the purposes of eliminating the evil. Those......

Words: 1397 - Pages: 6

More Details | Business Studies - 1459 Words | Blindspot saison 3 épisode 14