Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation

In: Business and Management

Submitted By iholton
Words 1585
Pages 7
Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation Mandatory audit firm rotation has been discussed by different accounting boards numerous times since the 1970s. Mandatory audit firm rotation would cause auditing firms to change clients after a certain amount of years with the client. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) has recently opened a discussion on audit firm rotation because the Board is concerned about the many problems that have come up on different auditing reports made by top auditing firms. PCAOB is concerned with auditor independence because they feel that it is being compromised as different firms continue to stay with particular clients for extended periods of time. This paper is going to discuss auditor independence and its effect on audit opinion, the history of audit firm rotation, and the advantages and disadvantages of audit firm rotation because it is a solution that is being considered. According to the PCAOB auditor independence is a description of the relationship between auditor and client and the mindset with which the auditor must approach his or her work. A measure for the mindset is the auditor’s ability to exercise professional skepticism, which is an attitude that includes a questioning mind and a critical assessment of audit evidence. For the last eight years the Board conducted annual inspections of the largest audit firms and found that more than 2,800 of the firm’s engagements were audit failures. An audit failure is a failure to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. This means that investors relied on an audit opinion that was not supported by sufficient appropriate evidence. (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 2011) The Board does not want to think that the reason for so many audit failures is the relationship that the audit firms have with their clients…...

Similar Documents

Audit Firms Work

...September 23, 2012 Audit Firms’ Work Deemed Deficient September 17, 2012 Siyuan Zhu I. Summary of the Story with Key points clearly identified Recently, regulators discover that big audit firms’ work has a substantial amount of serious deficiencies. Although the PCAOB conducts inspections of the big firms concentrate on problems at highest risk every year, it states that the report may not be truly reveal how frequently a firm’s overall audit work is deficient. Thus more work need to be done to improve the quality of audit services. II. My Reaction to the story with rationale and possible solutions From my perspective, the primary target of the audit today is the verification of financial statements. The audit is an important part of the capital market framework as it not only reduces the cost of information exchange between managers and shareholders but also provides a signaling mechanism to the markets that the information which management is providing is reliable. At the same time, the audit will lose its value when independence which gives credibility to the financial statements is undermined, which is the exact situation in the journal. To promote the independence of external auditors as well as to ensure the quality of audit services, it is significant and profound to establish an audit committee separate from management inside a company. Specifically, the audit committee is responsible for monitoring, overseeing, and evaluating the duties and......

Words: 477 - Pages: 2

Audit Rotation

...Mandatory Audit Rotation Introduction In 2002, Enron became the largest case of fraud in history. It caused it investors to lose sixty billion dollars, two million two hundred thousand in pension plans, and five thousand six hundred jobs (Enron Sentences Will Be Tied to Investor Losses). This all could have been avoided if public companies were forced to changed independent auditors every five years. Throughout this paper, I will be talking about mandatory audit rotation and why I think it is a great idea. First I will talk about the Sarbanes Oxley act and what it requires when it comes to partner rotation. It is important to know what the current rules and requirements are before we discuss how they should be changed. The next item I will discuss is auditor independence and how it is affected by audit rotation. After I talk about the current rules and independence, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of mandatory audit rotation. Sarbanes-Oxley Act In 2002, President George W. Bush signed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to protect investors from the possibility of fraudulent activities by corporations. This act was aimed to improve financial statements of corporations and prevent fraud. In section 203 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, it gives the requirements of partner rotation. “The new rules provide that an accounting firm will not be independent if either the lead audit partner or the concurring partner performs audit services for more than five......

Words: 1662 - Pages: 7

Mandatory Firm Rotation

...Mandatory Firm Rotation Background With the fast advent of globalization, countries, regions and governments have become more interdependent. Companies all over the world including small- and medium-sized entities work together and across geographies to attain sustainable growth. With the world becoming more borderless, it is then imperative that a strong financial planning must be made available for universal adoption. The international business environment relies on unbiased, clear, consistent, relevant and high quality standards. The task to develop and review internationally accepted standards was given to accounting councils and organizations such as IFRS Advisory Council and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). With the shared thoughts for a better and universally applicable accounting, accounting-related boards and councils, managers and accountants all over the world constantly review existing standards and examine its implementation. One issue that has been a hot topic of recent debates is the concept of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation that was released by the PCAOB (TYSIAC, 2012). The Issue The conception of mandatory firm rotation is not fresh and was even considered by the U.S. Congress in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Congress however dismissed the concept in favor of the mandatory engagement partner rotation (Point of View, 2012). However, years after the conception of mandatory firm rotation was revived. Last August 16, a concept......

Words: 1246 - Pages: 5

Audit Policy Paper

...Mandatory Auditor Rotation Policy Through the course of an audit, auditors are constantly faced with pressure from the client regarding financial reporting and other issues that may arise. Clients can threaten to terminate the auditor, resulting in lost fees and tarnished reputations as the firm tries to pursue future clients. In these cases, partner evaluations can be negatively affected since they are judged based on hours billed and the number of clients they are able to secure. Mandatory auditor rotation is defined as the obligation to limit the number of years during which the accounting firm may be the auditor of record for a client. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) is a strong advocate in favor of mandatory auditor rotation, while a majority of accounting firms are opposed to the idea. Problems are more likely to develop in the initial years of the audit relationship (fraud and bankruptcy) when the auditor tries to gain as much knowledge as possible about the client. According to an American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) study (Church and Zhang 2006, page 3), audit failures are three times more likely to occur in the first two years of the auditor-client engagement. Auditor rotations have never been mandated in the United States, and I believe this should continue in the future due to the high costs and decreased auditor effectiveness that would result from continual changes in the auditor-client......

Words: 2151 - Pages: 9

On the Job Rotation

...employee motivation. There is no doubt that a well trained and developed staff will be a valuable asset to the company and thereby increasing the chances of his efficiency in discharging his or her duties. Trainings in an organization can be mainly of two types; Internal and External training sessions. Internal training involves when training is organized in-house by the human resources department or training department using either a senior staff or any talented staff in the particular department as a resource person.  On the other hand external training is normally arranged outside the firm and is mostly organized by training institutes or consultants. Whichever training, it is very important for all staff and helps in building career positioning and preparing staff for greater challenges in developing world. How ever the training is costly. Because of that, people who work at firms do not receive external trainings most of times. The cost is a major issue for the lack of training programs in Sri Lanka. But nowadays, a new concept has come with these trainings which is “Trainers through trainees”. While training their employees in large quantities, many countries use that method in present days to reduce their training costs. The theory of this is, sending a little group or an individual for a training program sunder a bonding agreement or without a bond. When they come back to work, the externally trained employees train the employees who have not participated for......

Words: 9448 - Pages: 38

Corporations Legislation Amendment (Audit Enhancement) Bill 2012

...A major step in the direction towards improving the audit quality and at the same time ensuring that Australia’s regulatory framework is in line with international best practice; is the proposed Corporations Legislation Amendment (Audit Enhancement) Bill 2012. Various measures and reforms have been drafted in the legislation with a view to achieve this purpose and also to ensure that the audit regulation framework is in line with the dynamic environment Australia is operating in. Let us discuss these measures to see what they mean and refer to, and form an opinion as to why were these introduced. The first measure requires the audit firms to publish an annual transparency report in the event that they conduct audit of 10 or more significant entities. This is applicable to those audit firms which carry out an audit of 10 or more than 10 significant entities in an year. These entities may be listed companies or other listed registered schemes. The auditor in such a case is required to publish an annual transparency report on the auditor’s website as well as with the ASIC. The contents of the transparency report are required to be as per the provisions of Sec 332B of the Corporations Act and other regulations. These mainly contain information about the ownership, structure, governance and other factual information relating to such audit firms. The idea is that information regarding such audit firms who are carrying audit of large entities is available to their existing as well...

Words: 1274 - Pages: 6

Audit

...Section A: Audit Practice Part b (i): Why is the audit of cash important part of the audit? From an auditing standpoint, cash is an important account because cash transactions affect all other business and financial processes. Businesses acquire cash by selling goods or services, disposing of fixed assets, or acquiring debt or equity. The same businesses put their cash to use through purchasing, paying employees, and buying inventory. Audits are an important part of business. Cash audits check that money has been handled properly, and performance audits ascertain whether employees are doing their jobs properly. Corporations are likely to undergo tax audits to ensure proper tax reporting and withholding. Audits may be performed in-house by management or human resources, by a third-party consulting firm hired specifically to perform the audits or by IRS agents who are auditing company tax records. The audit of cash is considered an important part of an audit mainly due to almost all business transactions will be ultimately settled through the cash accounts, the audit of cash accounts also assists in the verification of other asset and liability accounts as well as revenue and expenses. Some of the investor relies on the accuracy of the cash account to evaluate the financial health of the company. They use current asset which include the cash account to compute several financial measures. Other than that, cash is the highly liquid asset in a company and it is an area of high...

Words: 9221 - Pages: 37

Audit

...auditors are not independence. The whole audit progress would be argued that the auditor had given the bias opinion to the client if there was no independence. Therefore, the accounting profession such as auditor and qualified accountant has faced the pressure for improving the quality of the audited reports. Jackson, Moldrich and Roebuck (2008) view the audit quality from perceived and actual quality. Actual quality shows the material errors risk level in financial statements and it can be reduced by the auditor. While perceived quality is the users confidence level in financial statements and effectiveness of the auditors in reducing the misstatement in financial statement done by management. However, there are variety of factors might affect the audit quality, but only 4 identified factors which is size of audit firm, auditor’s tenure, auditor’s experience and pricing pressure will be discussed in this paper. 2.1 Independent Variable 2.1.1 Auditor’s Tenure and Audit Quality The studies on auditor tenure cannot be separated with the auditor switching studies which formally known as auditor rotation. Auditor rotation can either is mandatory or voluntary. Voluntary rotation is the clients have option to switch auditors while mandatory rotation is pushes clients to change auditors after a fixed period (Mohamed & Habib, 2013) Previous researches had indicated that auditor’s tenure is related to the impact on audit quality. According to Geiger and......

Words: 3078 - Pages: 13

Should Audit Firms Be Required to Rotate on Public Companies

...Date: February 26, 2015 Re: Should Companies be required to rotate their auditing firms on a regular basis? As an accountant entering the modern business world, a case instilled in our minds is the Enron Scandal. For accountants, this was an embarrassing scenario and by effect brought numerous reforms, laws, and regulations. Many of these rulings are apparent in the present corporate setting. The division of accounting most affected by this scandal was the role and function of the external auditors. Auditors by trade serve in the public and stockholders interest. Furthermore, the independence of auditors is essential in performing their duties properly. As a result, which practices are needed to achieve total independence? Moreover, how do we weigh the cost of financial misstatements with the cost of redundancy due to rotation of audit firms? Demanding public companies to rotate their audit firms may appear reasonable on paper, however, this rotation brings more concerns than answers. Currently in the auditing of publicly held companies, lead audit partners are required to rotate of audits every five years. This ruling was enacted from the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). Also, SOX requires a 1-year cooling off period if the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO), controller, etc. was previously employed by and participated in the audit one year prior to the start of the audit. These laws were passed to promote auditor independence, yet some......

Words: 1560 - Pages: 7

Auditor En Audit-Firm Rotation

...Auditor en Audit-firm rotation In december 2003 kon Parmalat een obligatielening van 150 miljoen euro niet terugbetalen, terwijl het 4.5 miljard aan liquide middelen zou hebben. Dit geld bleek er echter niet te zijn, er was fraude gepleegd met betrekking tot de jaarrekening en er was leningdocumentatie vervalst. Later verdween Parmalat zelfs van de beurs. Naar aanleiding van het Parmalat-schandaal en een aantal soortgelijke boekhoudschandalen in de afgelopen eeuw, (zoals Enron, Worldcom, en Xerox) wordt er toenemende kritiek geuit naar de rol van de externe accountant als onafhankelijke derde partij. Als reactie op de boekhoudschandalen is er wereldwijd aanscherping van de controle- en verslaggevingregels. Verplichte rotatie is een van de mogelijke oplossingen. Hierbij wordt gewisseld van accountant (auditor rotation) of van het accountantsbureau (audit-firm rotation). Dit zou voorkomen dat de accountant wordt beïnvloed door het bedrijf wat opportunistische manipulatie tot gevolg zou hebben. In deze tekst wordt onderzocht of het wisselen van accountantskantoor daadwerkelijk een gunstige invloed heeft op de kwaliteit van de accountantsverklaring. De primaire rol van de accountant is het verhogen van de kwaliteit van de financiële informatie in overeenstemming met de normen van de PCAOB. Het doel is ervoor te zorgen dat er geen materiële afwijkingen in de jaarrekening van een entiteit zitten (Marshall, McManus, & Viele, 2013, p. 408). Financiële verslaggeving wordt......

Words: 1210 - Pages: 5

Auditor Rotation

...I. Audit Quality The primary role of accounting is to reduce information asymmetry by providing investors with relevant and reliable information in order to create an efficient allocation of resources. However, there is often a tradeoff between relevance and reliability that needs to be considered when imposing regulations (Scott, 2012). When information asymmetry is present, investor faith decreases, compromising the efficiency of the market. In order to prevent market failures, it is critical to maintain investor confidence; this can be done by achieving high audit quality. Definition The PCAOB defines audit quality as providing “independent and reliable audits” regarding management’s financial statements, internal controls and potential threat for going concerns (PCAOB, 2013). Four key aspects of audit quality include independence, objectivity, skepticism, and competence. Maintaining and improving the four elements is critical to increasing audit quality and the usefulness of the information provided. Independence According to the PCAOB Auditing Standards, auditors should maintain independent mental attitudes. Independence is defined by the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct as independence of both, mind and appearance. Independence of mind requires the auditor to act with integrity, free of outside influence whereas independence of appearance requires the avoidance of situations leading to potential conflict of interests. Unless, the auditor is truly independent, the...

Words: 5991 - Pages: 24

Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation

...Evidence the supports “Mandatory Auditor Rotation”: Auditor independence is widely considered one of the main causes for the occurrence of accounting fraud and in 2003 congress considered mandatory audit firm rotation as a possible solution. The ruling congress gave was in favor of mandatory audit engagement partner rotation. The reasoning behind the ruling was the surprising lack of evidence found supporting mandatory audit firm rotation as the best solution to improve auditor independence. If mandatory audit firm rotation were passed by congress, auditor independence is likely to improve, however the consequences may not be exactly as anticipated. Audit firms will be further obligated to perform ethical and appropriate work since the next auditor will deeply examine their work. The vast majority of accounting fraud cases in the past have occurred after several years of a company being audited by the same audit firm. The auditor client long-term relationship clearly impairs the auditor independence but is mandatory audit rotation the best solution for auditor independence? We do not agree with mandatory audit firm rotation as the appropriate solution to strengthening auditor independence. Studies have shown that countries requiring mandatory audit firm rotation show little to no evidence that it improves auditor independence. An auditor’s familiarity with the business and the industry in which it operates is essential to the quality of the audit. While accumulating......

Words: 364 - Pages: 2

An Examination of Partner Perceptions of Partner Rotation

...Partner Rotation: Direct and Indirect Consequences to Audit Quality Key Points: * In order to improve audit quality by making auditors more independent, regulators mandate partner rotation and cooling-off periods. Specifically, partners would be required to rotate off to another client every five years. As stated in the article, rotation improves independence resulting in a positive impact on audit quality. * However, more often than not, partners would much rather enter a new industry than relocate to preserve their quality of life. Most partners opt to retrain rather than relocate, thus affecting audit quality negatively. Based on the findings described in the article, 93% of audit partners reported needing at least two years to become fully effective in a new engagement. Even partners who stay within the same industry line need some time to get used to differing information technology and other processing systems, client personnel, corporate governance characteristics, and the time it takes to gain client trust at the senior management and board levels. * There are some costs related to rotations, and a cost-benefit analysis should be performed. With that said, it might be hard to quantify the costs and benefits of this situation. How do you weigh the improvement in audit quality due to independence against its decline due to a lag in audit effectiveness (resulting from either a change in client or a change in industry altogether)? * Rotations......

Words: 348 - Pages: 2

The Effect of Audit Firm Size on Audit Prices

...The effect of audit firm size on audit prices The study is to mainly address questions about how accounting firm size affects the audit prices and and the issue on how auditor changes affect companies’ audit fees. Three factors, which are market competition, the extent to which audit services are differentiated, and scale economies, can affect the relationship between audit prices and accounting firm size. There is one view that if audits are homogeneous goods, accounting firm size would not affect either audits or audit prices. However, there are reasons to believe that audits are not homogenous goods and that product differentiation occurs with respect to audit quality. As mentioned, audits are a market for reputations. Shockley reports evidence that perceptions of auditor independence are significantly different between large and small accounting firms and that perceptions of auditor reputation are also different even within the Big Eight group. Therefore, public companies prefer large accounting firms that auditors have higher education. Further, the studies have made several hypotheses to examine the questions and also used a regression model to determine the effects of accounting firm size on audit fees in the Australian market. Simunic used ten variables to control for the quantity of auditing supplied and partitioned the sample into large and small auditees. This is to test a joint hypothesis of product differentiation and economies of scale, which support......

Words: 317 - Pages: 2

Audit Partner Rotation

...into the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, under Section 10A: (j) AUDIT PARTNER ROTATION – It shall be unlawful for a registered public accounting firm to provide audit services to an issuer if the lead (or coordinating) audit partner (having primary responsibility for the audit), or the audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit, has performed audit services for that issuer in each of the 5 previous fiscal years of that issuer.[1] For the purpose of clarity it is deemed that the Lead and Concurring partner perform the critical functions that affect the conduct and effectiveness of an audit engagement.[2] With respect to Section 203 of the Sarbanes and Oxley Act of 2002, the initial law was silent with respect to the time out period; therefore, the SEC ruled that the appropriate length would be a minimum of 5-years[3]. It is the belief of the SEC that the auditor’s independence shall be compromised after its fifth year of service and in fact their independency would no longer exist, as they would be auditing their own work beyond that timeline and that there was a real need for new eyes to further enhance the auditor’s independence. It should be noted, the SEC determined that certain partners are deemed specialty experts and that their primary function is to provide technical resources to the audit team members; therefore, they are to be excluded from rotation.[4] As they have no oversight of the audit activities and have limited interaction with the......

Words: 749 - Pages: 3

Hannibal | Watch now! | Chandra Nandni