Mcgregor

In: Business and Management

Submitted By tomnguyen
Words 2158
Pages 9
CHAPTER SIX: STRUCTURE

The learning goal of this chapter is to teach students how to shape their messages and arguments into appropriate structures.

Since the chapter is long and contains, in effect, three mini-cases -- on Great Lakes, RAs, and Narrative -- you may choose to teach the chapter in one class and the case in the next.

One way to structure a class on this chapter is to emphasize the commonalities among logical, psychological, and narrative structures.

Beginning, Middle, and End

Both an argument (given, since, therefore) and a communication structure (introduction, body, conclusion) share the same features, that is, they have a beginning, a middle, and an end. We discuss these features in further detail in the Guides to Effective Writing and Speaking in Part Three. Here, we simply encourage the instructor to pull together some organizational principles.

Some suggestions for focusing student discussion: When defining your content, marshalling your arguments, and developing your structure, try to meet the following criteria:

Beginnings should:

1. Gain the audience's attention and focus it on your topic.

2. Explain why the topic is important, timely, or otherwise of interest.

3. Indicate the point of view you will take or suggest your conclusion.

4. Establish a relationship of mutual respect with your audience.

Middles should:

1. Develop your main argument by identifying and addressing its component parts.

2. Address subtopics according to their level of importance (either ascending or descending).

3. Clearly signal how each part of your argument fits into the whole.

4. Acknowledge and neutralize reasonable alternative proposals.
Endings should:

1. Show how your evidence and arguments lead to your conclusion.

2. Emphasize the importance of your proposal.

3. Show how the expectations raised in your…...

Similar Documents

Book Review - the Human Side of Enterprise

...Part 1 The Theoretical assumptions of management Chapter 1 Management and scientific knowledge Douglas McGregor asks to tune ears while listening to managerial meeting to extract assumptions about human behavior. Response to managerial decisions is by blaming. McGregor states that there is no prediction without theory and all managerial decisions rest on assumptions about behavior. He also suggests that social sciences will develop a predictive capability comparable to that of physical sciences. Though the fields of management science, organizational science and decision science have progressed substantially since 1960, including important work about biases in human judgment, optimization of complex networks, the scientific advances about the fundamental nature of human beings at work remain indefinable. Chapter 2 Methods of influence and control McGregor, a seminal thinker, states that power to influence others is not a function of amount of authority one can exert. It is a function of the appropriate selection of the means of influence that the particular situation demands. He also points out that with a modern society of interdependence, influence, much more than authority, is central to success. Supporting examples: fields of communications and negotiations Generalizations:- Man is a wanting animal – as soon as one of his needs is satisfied, another appears in its place. This process is unending. It continues from birth to death. Man continuously puts forth......

Words: 4091 - Pages: 17

Teoría Y de Mcgregor

...TEORÍA “ Y “ (Douglas McGregor) Douglas McGregor propuso dos puntos de vista distintos acerca de la naturaleza de los humanos. Uno es básicamente un punto de vista negativo, denominado Teoría X y la otra refiere a un punto de vista positivo llamado Teoría Y, que es en dicha teoría donde centraremos nuestra atención. Los directivos de la Teoría Y consideran que sus subordinados encuentran en su empleo una fuente de satisfacción y que se esforzarán siempre por lograr los mejores resultados para la organización, siendo así, las empresas deben liberar las aptitudes de sus trabajadores en favor de dichos resultados. FUNDAMENTOS QUE CARACTERIZAN A LA TEORÍA Y : - Los empleados pueden considerar el trabajo tan natural como el descanso y el juego. - La gente ejercerá auto dirección y autocontrol si está comprometida con los objetivos. - La persona promedio puede aprender a aceptar e incluso buscar asumir responsabilidades. - La capacidad de tomar decisiones innovadoras está ampliamente dispersa en todos los trabajadores y no necesariamente en aquellos que ocupan puestos administrativos., ya que todos poseen un alto grado de imaginación, creatividad e ingenio que permitirá dar solución a los problemas de la organización. - Los trabajadores se comprometen con los objetivos empresariales en la medida que se les recompense por sus logros, la mejor recompensa es la satisfacción del ego y puede ser originada por el esfuerzo hecho para conseguir los objetivos de la......

Words: 367 - Pages: 2

Mcgregor's Leadership Model

...McGregor’s Leadership Model In the modern business world, leadership is an essential key to long-term business success. One professional who has developed a theory associated with leadership is Douglas McGregor. This theory suggests that two types of leadership exist. These types are called X leadership and Y leadership. Differing academics have researched the X and Y leadership views and determined various levels of validity associated with this theory. To determine the value of this theory, the research and example-based use of this theory presented by others must be reviewed. Similarly, company leaders must review the history of leadership practices and develop methods that have the highest potential for success in the environment associated company-specific operational activities. Douglas McGregor developed his theory of X and Y leadership in the 1960s at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He believed companies can achieve quality leadership through basic employee motivation. The X and Y styles of motivation are opposite one another and in direct contrast. The X style of leadership and employee motivation states employees lack motivation and are lazy in nature. Essentially, individual employees lack motivation and must be supervised by leaders on a continual basis because those employees avoid responsibility whenever possible. This close supervision narrows employee versatility and requires extensive time and guidance by specific leaders. To establish employee......

Words: 1250 - Pages: 5

Scientific Managament

...pinoeers of managamnet, like Robert Own and Charles Babbage, through the time of classical managamnet, to scientific managamnet and other contemporary theories, we have had many people with different ideas and strategies on how to imrove the managamnet of the company. This research will concentrate on the work of one of the scientific managamnet theorists, Douglas McGregor. Scientifc managamnt is a type of managamnet that emphasizes on workflows and specifically on labor productivity. Managers in this period have made a significant influence on managamnet as a whole, since this was the first time managament was considered a science. Frederic Taylor, who is considered to be the father of scientific managament, started developing scietific managament in 1880's. After his theories became famous, there were many more followers of scientific managamanet and many other theorists, like Douglas McGregor. Douglas McGreorg was born in 1906, received quality edcuation, peeking with the Ph.D. form Harward University in 1935. (The Economist) He is most famous for his book "The Human Side of Enterprise", thus his theoy of X and Y. McGregor theorizes that management should view the employees' motivation for work in two distinct ways, Theory X and Theory Y. Theory x is authoritative and it assumes that workers naturally do not like to work and that managers have to make effort to make the employees work. (The Economist) The following are principles of Theory X: 1) The average worker......

Words: 590 - Pages: 3

Business

...Administration Research and Theory, Inc. 240 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory If man is not what conventional organizational theory assumes him to be, then much of the organization planning carried on within the framework of that theory is nothing more than a game of logic. —Douglas McGregor, quoted in Warren Bennis, Edgar H. Schein, and Caroline McGregor, Douglas McGregor, Revisited: Managing the Human Side of Enterprise In 1960, Douglas McGregor published The Human Side of Enterprise (THSE), fundamentally altering the course of management theory. McGregor’s perspective was that management was more than simply giving orders and coercing obedience; it was a careful balancing of the needs of the organization with the needs of individuals (McGregor 1960, 53–55; Bennis, Heil, and Stephens 2000, 87). He defined these individual needs through psychologist Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs (Bennis, Heil, and Stephens 2000, 129). At the time of McGregor’s writings, social scientists were finding a great deal of support for Maslow’s arguments (McGregor 1960, 36). By applying the idea of a hierarchy of needs to the work environment of the mid- and late 1950s, McGregor offered a new theory of management that promised to unlock the creative potential of the American workforce and bring about a new era of management theory and practice. In the forty-three years since the publication of THSE, three core elements of McGregor’s theory have undergone......

Words: 14544 - Pages: 59

Management Thoughts

...Douglas McGregor introduced two theories that are still commonly used for motivation and management today. They are Theory X and Theory Y. He was influenced by Dr Abraham Maslow’s Humanistic School of Psychology and based his researches on Dr Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, namely psychological, safety, love, esteem and self actualisation. He saw these two theories (X & Y) as two quite separate attitudes. He was a forerunner for seeing the need of values-based leadership. These’s values are from one’s belief, assumptions about what seems to cause what, and fundamental attitudes. McGregor’s goal was to introduce a framework that provides ways of liberating the employees from authoritarian leadership and management with a good balance of soft and hard management styles. Managements that are hard or strong had an environment of command and control involving close supervision, tight controls and limited flexibilities as opposed to soft management which involve satisfying employees’ demands, seeks harmony and being permissive with more flexibility which employees will cooperate in return. Having said these, hard and soft management are not the best management styles. The hard approach resulted in hostility, low-output, and extreme union demands and the soft approach resulted in increasing desire for greater reward in exchange for diminishing work output. The characteristic of McGregor’s Theory X is much of a top-down approach of decision making. It is a conventional......

Words: 1150 - Pages: 5

Acounting

...Former IASB member Warren McGregor has coauthored a paper on the conceptual framework arguing that the conceptual framework is the cornerstone of high quality financial reporting and claiming that the new framework should be 'aspirational'. The paper offers an overview of the history of frameworks from standard-setting before the advent of frameworks to the present state of play in the IASB's project on the conceptual framework, lists the areas where the current framework is incomplete or needs revisions and contains an urgent call for the new framework to be aspirational and not just a confirmation of the status quo of standard-setting and of the current application of the standards. We are grateful to Mr McGregor and his co-author Ms Jan McCahey for allowing us to host this paper on IAS Plus. Former IASB member Warren McGregor has coauthored a paper on the conceptual framework arguing that the conceptual framework is the cornerstone of high quality financial reporting and claiming that the new framework should be 'aspirational'. The paper offers an overview of the history of frameworks from standard-setting before the advent of frameworks to the present state of play in the IASB's project on the conceptual framework, lists the areas where the current framework is incomplete or needs revisions and contains an urgent call for the new framework to be aspirational and not just a confirmation of the status quo of standard-setting and of the current application of the......

Words: 805 - Pages: 4

The Leadership Pipeline

...chain. At the same time, functional managers tend to be older and more experienced than me, I need to prepare myself to understand and challenge their contributions without sounding too inexperienced. Discuss/compare McGregor & Wolford’s leadership styles. How effectively are they going through their leadership passages? I believe that McGregor and Wolford are at passage four of the leadership ladder, however none of them is performing at that level, McGregor could easily be at passage 5, while Wolford is struggling to get out of passage 2. Their management styles are totally opposite, while McGregor allows an incredible amount of autonomy, Wolford is into the day-to-day operations, and problem solving. McGregor mobilizes towards a vision and set high standards, his people is highly motivated in an environment where they help each other, their drive is to become someday “the Thursday man”. In the other hand, Wolford is lacking self-management skills and self -awareness, he needs to step back and organize himself toward the strategy and vision of his division, develop his team, and delegate and coach them. Even if the day would have 48 hours, he will not finish with all the issues and task that are arising in the day to day operations. McGregor wants people to believe that he does not take any decisions, however with the control system he designed, he is actually taking decision by letting his people to succeed and fail, he will be there to step-in if anything......

Words: 482 - Pages: 2

Human Side of Entreprise

...way they apply new methods but ultimately they adapt to new findings from the social sciences. Mr. McGregor describes the evolution of management concepts in the last century by contrasting the conventional view that he called “Theory X” and the new and more progressive theory that he calls “Theory Y”. Several authors noted that “McGregor's landmark book, The Human Side of Enterprise (1960) changed the path of management thinking and practice. Questioning some of the fundamental assumptions about human behavior in organizations” (Kopelman, Prottas, & Davis, 2008). Theory X assumes that the role of management is to organize the different elements of the firm including money, materials, equipment, and people with the purpose of making a profit. Theory X also assumes that management should control and modify people’s behavior in order to motivate them. According to McGregor the average man is lazy and lacks motivation, therefore it is the manager’s responsibility to control employees through “coercion and threat (usually disguised)” in order to keep them in line (McGregor, 2011). When practicing the theory X, one may choose to apply a hard or soft style of control. The hard style of control creates more resistance from employees whereas the soft style creates complacency from employees. It is the task of the manager to find the right equilibrium between the two styles (McGregor, 2011). Studies from social sciences have shown that the assumptions on which theory X is based on......

Words: 1552 - Pages: 7

Keller vs Mcgregor

...a team, people and company. From one side, we can see Keller, a very successful executive, who is completely involved with his people, the company’s process and every interaction his team makes inside and outside the organization, and, from the opposite side, we can see McGregor, a very well experimented operations executive, who lets his team take all the decisions (delegates 100%), and pushes them to keep taking them. McGregor, along with his introverted and powerful personality, is a very well experimented operations manager, with full knowledge of how the refinery he has been managing for many years works. With a team who is very devoted to him, McGregor took no part in everyday decision making, without keeping control of details. He had a tough but effective coaching approach, pushing and confronting his executives, guiding them carefully through a decision making process, in order for them to analyze the best and most practical way to come up with solutions. This also helped all his direct reports to grow within the organization quite quickly, until they became managers of their own refinery. Evidently, when he had to take decisions, he made them without hesitating. This management approach let McGregor to have time for himself, to improve his golf skills, and to live life with more time on his hands. Keller, a very young and very well prepared (Harvard Business School) successful executive, had other great skills and a very different way to interact with his team.......

Words: 597 - Pages: 3

Management Theory

...an enterprise and the primary source of long-term differentiation between firms. According to Steven Covey’s, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People it is based upon a set of principles that directs individual effectiveness through inside-out management, one that begins with a focus on one’s self. I will summarize the management theories, how they apply to my organization, compare and contrast two articles that relate to my organization and evaluate my organization in relation to my analysis. Theory X and Theory Y developed by Douglas McGregor in the 1950’s are to be considered theoretical assumptions of management. The focus of theories was on the cosomolgy of managers to elucidate the effects of managerial assumptions on employee work behavior. The central task of management is the control, where they cannot be any prediction without underling the theory. All management decisions and actions rest on a personally held theory (McGregor, Douglas, 1960). McGregor’s ideas of the theories reflect the six ideas, (1) managers make assumptions about employees in work organizations, even if they are unaware of doing so. (2) Two broad categories of managerial assumptions can be identified: an unenthusiastic view (Theory X), and a more enthusiastic view (Theory Y), (3) there are three element dimensions noteworthy to these assumptions, namely whether people are seen as; inherently lazy versus industrious, possessing a limited versus important capacity for useful contributions,......

Words: 1772 - Pages: 8

Accounting Example

...Group Work – Chapter 7 1. Assume McGregor Inc. has the following account balances at December 31, 2014 – before adjusting entries: Refer to the information above for McGregor a. If McGregor uses the Balance Sheet Approach and estimates its bad debt for the year to be 6% of the Accounts Receivable balance, prepare the adjusting journal entry as of December 31, 2014. [54,000 * .06 = 3,240] DR CR Bad Debt Expense 3,740 Allowance For Doubtful Accounts 3,740 b. What is the Net Realizable Value of Accounts Receivable that will be reported on the December 31, 2014 Balance Sheet after the adjusting entry is posted? Accounts Receivable 54,000 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (3,240) Net Realizable Value of AR 50,760 c. Assume, on January 8, 2015, JD Rhimes Inc. contacts McGregor Inc and says they have declared bankruptcy and will not be able to pay their Accounts Receivable debt of $2,000. Prepare the journal entry to write-off this customer’s account. DR CR Allowance For Doubtful Accounts 2,000 Accounts Receivable 2,000 d. What is the Net Realizable Value of Accounts Receivable on January 8, 2015 after the customer write off? [Assume no other activity has affected those accounts since December 31, 2014.] Accounts Receivable 52,000 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (1,240) Net Realizable Value of AR 50,760 e. Does the write off affect the......

Words: 1161 - Pages: 5

How We Ended Up with 15 Different Kinds of Plugs and Sockets?

...too unsafe and decide to develop their own. It is used in North and Central America plus Japan. (International Electrotechnical Commission 2015) Type A normally has voltage between 100 and 127 V and it is rated as 15 A. It is also not grounded unlike it´s so called sister type B and it has 2 pins as shown in picture. Socket is only compatible with this type of plug. (H. McGregor 2015) (Figure 1) Type B (see fig. 2.) is based on Type A. It was invented and patented by man named Phillip F. Labre in 1928. He deduced because of his landlady´s cat that electricity would rather go to earth than person and that is how he invented grounded plug. So difference between A and B is that B has 3 pins instead of 2 and that third additional pin is the earth which means that plug is grounded. (International Electrotechnical Commission 2015) (AC power plugs and sockets 2015) Voltage is between 100 and 127 V usually and it is also rated as 15 A. It is used in North and Central America plus Japan. Socket is compatible with Type A and B plug instead of socket of type A which is only compatible with Type A plug. (H. McGregor 2015) (Figure 2) Type C (see fig. 3.) is One of the most common used plugs in the world and also one of the oldest plugs still in use. Socket of this type is restricted in almost every country by now but plug is as said one of the if it not even the most used plug in the world. This is also an example of plug that fits Europlug standard. Voltage is between......

Words: 4055 - Pages: 17

Bring

...Leadership Assumptions about Human Nature Why do some managers believe that the only way to manage employees is to force and coerce them to work while others adopt a more humane approach? Douglas McGregor, an MIT Sloan School of Management professor, believed that a manager’s actions toward employees were dictated by having one of two basic sets of assumptions about employee attitudes. His two contrasting categories, outlined in his 1960 book, The Human Side of Enterprise, are known as Theory X and Theory Y. According to McGregor, some managers subscribe to Theory X. The main assumptions of Theory X managers are that employees are lazy, do not enjoy working, and will avoid expending energy on work whenever possible. For a manager, this theory suggests employees need to be forced to work through any number of control mechanisms ranging from threats to actual punishments. Because of the assumptions they make about human nature, Theory X managers end up establishing rigid work environments. Theory X also assumes employees completely lack ambition. As a result, managers must take full responsibility for their subordinates’ actions, as these employees will never take initiative outside of regular job duties to accomplish tasks. In contrast, Theory Y paints a much more positive view of employees’ attitudes and behaviors. Under Theory Y, employees are not lazy, can enjoy work, and will put effort into furthering organizational goals. Because these managers can assume that employees...

Words: 1810 - Pages: 8

Student

...• Describe the assumptions behind McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y. In his 1960 book, The Human Side of Enterprise, Douglas McGregor proposed two theories by which to view employee motivation. He avoided descriptive labels and simply called the theories Theory X and Theory Y. Both of these theories begin with the premise that management's role is to assemble the factors of production, including people, for the economic benefit of the firm. Beyond this point, the two theories of management diverge. Theory X Theory X assumes that the average person: • Dislikes work and attempts to avoid it. • Has no ambition, wants no responsibility, and would rather follow than lead. • Is self-centered and therefore does not care about organizational goals. • Resists change. • Is gullible and not particularly intelligent. Essentially, Theory X assumes that people work only for money and security. Theory X - The Hard Approach and Soft Approach Under Theory X, management approaches can range from a hard approach to a soft approach. The hard approach relies on coercion, implicit threats, close supervision, and tight controls, essentially an environment of command and control. The soft appoach is to be permissive and seek harmony with the hope that in return employees will cooperate when asked to do so. However, neither of these extremes is optimal. The hard approach results in hostility, purposely low-output, and hard-line union demands. The soft approach results......

Words: 1224 - Pages: 5

film complet | The Complete Chess Course - From Beginning to Winning Chess - 21st Century Edition (2016).epub Gooner | MLA Paper