Private Property Free Speech

In: Social Issues

Submitted By christine1jacoub
Words 279
Pages 2
Question: What speech rights does one have on privately owned property?

When it comes to private property, individuals' First Amendment speech rights do not always come out on top. The First Amendment doesn't give you the right to engage in free-speech activities on private property unless you own or lease the property, or the owner has given you permission to use the property for speech. Because private property is not government-owned, restrictions on individuals' free speech rights on private property do not involve state action. For example, in Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board, union members filed suit claiming that their First Amendment free speech rights were being violated when they were asked to leave the premises or be arrested for criminal trespass. However, the Supreme Court found that the First Amendment does not prevent a property owner from restricting the exercise of free speech on his or her private property, which in this case, was Hudgen's North DeKalb Shopping Center. Although this case explains that in regards to free speech rights, it is really up to the private property owner to distinguish what content is allowed or prohibited, there is another side to Free Speech rights on private property. There are a few states that have interpreted their own state constitution to provide greater free speech protection than the Federal constitution. In Pruneyard v. Robins, the Court held that California's constitution gave citizens the right to speak freely, even in private owned malls.In California, the courts recognize big malls as the modern day "functional equivalent" of a traditional public gathering, meaning the constitution does protect your free-speech rights in privately owned shopping…...

Similar Documents

Free Speech Contorversy

...| Free Speech | And Society | | Ariel Kincaid | 11/1/2012 | Hum 176 Media and American Culture | The freedoms that the United States prides itself on came at a cost, and it continues to require a sacrifice from those members of the military and their families to protect the country. A controversy regarding the freedom of speech that has been covered recently by the media is the protests that the Westboro Baptist Church performs outside of military funerals. According to Fama (2012), “The church links the deaths of service members to America’s acceptance of gays and has a webpage full of press releases highlighting the picketing schedule of military service member funerals” (para. 11). This church group is considered a hate group by most people and highly controversial because they shout very cruel things to the families of soldiers that are being buried. This is a very touchy issue because the families of soldiers that gave their life in protecting their country are dealing with their grief as they bury their family member and are being bombarded with members of this church using their freedom of speech. The father of one of the soldiers whose funeral was protested sued the church’s Reverend and other members, but the ruling in his favor was later overturned by the state appeals court, and he was expected to pay the court costs for the church. Others helped him to raise the money necessary to pay these court costs. Then in 2011,......

Words: 991 - Pages: 4

Law Private Property

...not considered to be recognized by the law, the human being will then be considered as a species of property that can only be bought and sold,(Davies and Naffine at casebook, 26). In that period of time, the subjugated Africans that were brought to America or Europe did not reach a ‘legal status’, hence were not considered as legal persons. As a result of not being granted legal status, they were treated as property to be bought and sold; they did not have control or ‘protection’ of their own lives. This lack of legal status affected their lives over the years; they were “bought and sold, treated as an ordinary merchandise and traffic, whenever a profit could be made by it. This opinion was at that time fixed universal in the civilized portion of the white race.” (Brettle Dawson, 2101T S1_Introduction, Carleton University, May 8th 2012). Another case to support my answer is the Shelly v. Kraemer , they were not allowed obtaining a property based on their race. According to the philosopher John Locke, “a man cannot enslave himself to anyone; he cannot take his own life and give another power over it. To be a person is precisely not to be a property. A person is a ‘self-proprietor’.” 2) ‘’The concept of property gives shape and meaning to individualism. (Davies and Naffine at casebook, 20). Property offers us a sense of self-direction and self-sufficiency. Moreover, property is not a relationship between a person and a thing, but rather a relationship between persons with......

Words: 1573 - Pages: 7

Free Speech Presentation

...|another format |presentation media to create a presentation about | | |current, controversial issues involving free speech. You | | |have a chance to become involved in a subject they have | | |strong opinions about and to develop a logical discussion| | |about the outcome of the controversy. The option to use | | |various presentation media gives you a change to develop | | |existing skills in presentations. | |All key elements of the assignment are covered in a substantive way. | | |Presentation covers a controversial issue in the media that challenged | | |issues of free speech. The presentation includes the following: | | |Identification of the issue and why it caused controversy | ......

Words: 518 - Pages: 3

Free Speech and National Security

...Free Speech and National Security Harlan D. Almon HSM 305 Instructor William Barker May 20, 2013 Free Speech and National Security We, as a nation, have prided ourselves as a country with many freedoms. Freedom of speech being probably the most important. It allows us to say or print what we are feeling about a subject and not have to worry about consequences. Although living in a society that allows free speech is great, it has its consequences as well when it comes to keeping our nation safe. During war time, there have been times that our freedom of speech has been curbed. One could say that freedom of speech could actually help professionals in the Homeland Security field. Because we are a country that allows freedom of speech, radical terrorist groups could be found and stopped before they could carry out their attack. This is possible because they can become a suspect through the web through chat rooms, Facebook or any social media that you can find on the internet this days. They can even start their own websites. This makes coming up with suspects easier for the DHS and other law enforcement individuals. They can spend more time trying to stop these individuals, instead of trying to find out who these individuals are. In the First Amendment, it states, “Congress shall make no law [. . .] Abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press [.]” (Howington, 2012) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Art. 19 says “Everyone has the right to freedom of......

Words: 805 - Pages: 4

Free Speech

...Free Speech In recent times there have been protests at military funerals by a church group from Texas. This church has also been protesting the homosexual agenda that has lead a court ruling that they can get married. That marriage in all its forms is allowed whether it is between a man and a woman, or a same sex couple. This church leads these protests with signs that “destruction is imminent” or “USA = Fag Nation.” This has people in an uproar about the church and its use of their freedom of speech. They want this church to be banned from protesting and spreading their hate across the nation. But under the first amendment they are protected and allowed the freedom to do just what makes them unpopular. In 2010 the Westboro Baptist Church traveled to Maryland to picket the funeral of Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder, who was killed in Iraq in the line of duty. The father of the deceased took them to court citing intentional infliction of emotional distress, intrusion upon seclusion, and civil conspiracy. The local court ruled in favor of the father assigning damages to be paid to him. This was upheld in another court, but the damages were reduced. The Westboro Church went to the 4th circuit court for another appeal and the ruling was overturned, the court stated that “Westboro’s statements were entitled to First Amendment protection because those statements were on matters of public concern, were not provably false, and were expressed solely through hyperbolic rhetoric...

Words: 848 - Pages: 4

Free Speech

...David Guy Professor Adams English 102 January 30, 2013 Free Speech Since the birth of this great nation, free speech has been among the key facets that hold it together. The founding fathers felt the need to restrict the government’s power by sharing that power with the people through the passing of the First Amendment. This amendment states that the government can pass no law limiting the freedom of speech or press (“Freedom of Speech”). After all, if it hadn’t been for religious persecution, the pilgrims would not have left England to found a new nation. As Americans, we can express our opposition of the government’s actions and goals without repercussion. One form of free speech, elections, allows us to cast a vote for the candidate we see best fit to have a roll in our government. The idea of free speech suggests an equal partnership between government and citizen rather than an oppressive relationship seen in Communist countries like China and Cuba. Countries like these have developed using Communist methods, and for the most part relinquishing free speech rights from their citizens. Free speech guarantees the absence of tyranny and provides the most beneficial relationship between government and citizen. In the early 1620s, the first pilgrims came to the New World seeking religious freedom, but they ironically did not implement that idea into their culture. They had been denied the right to free speech in England because they held different beliefs than the......

Words: 856 - Pages: 4

Free Speech

...Free Speech one of the amendments in the constitution a goal for all American colonists The First Amendment to the United States still stand in this present time for all to show in demonstration, protest, in a public forum to get political information or ideas presented to groups of people or Congress on any subject matter consider for soul reasoning to express agreement or disagreement . The Supreme Court has protected free speech since 1925 from government interference by state and local branch done by due process clause 14 Amendment, on the same hand government restrict dangerous and immoral speech. There are 4 major restrictions on free speech, 1 cover libel, slander and prohibit ones privacy and reputation 2 free speech can’t have obscenities or encourages immoral acts, offends anyone publicly .3 free speech discourage using the ability to commit treason or causing violence actions on a life, property and national security.4 free speech can’t invade other choice unless permitted to do as such in meeting forum in order to discuss issue. Free speech is apart society we used in other countries unless under dictatorship some have remain the same throughout the centuries and other have adopt new government policy Later years free speech ruling lifted bans on book and writing that are seen to be too graphic or depict sexual acts they remain under guide line on presentation and interputation of information. Free speech is having the choice to state belief or say in private......

Words: 345 - Pages: 2

Private Property in the Muslim Jurists View

...THE PROPERTY VIEW OF MUSLIM JURISTS There are two views; according to the 1. Hanafis. 2. Malikis, Shafii’s, and Hanbalis Malikis, Shafii’s, and Hanbalis According to Malikis, Shafii’s, and Hanbalis who constitute majority of the Fiqh schools, mal includes all permissible things which have financial value. Definition of the Maliki school According to the Maliki jurist, Al-Shatibi, mal is the thing on which ownership is conferred and the owner when he assumes it excludes others from interference. This definition affirms the mal is the subject matter of ownership. I t also explains that the basis of property rights is the relationship standing between the thing and the person. Definition of the Shafi'i school Al-Zarkshi states that, "mal is what gives benefit, i.e. prepared to give benefit", and he continues to say at mal can be material objects or usufructs. The material objects are of two kinds: inorganic solid materials; and animals. The solid materials are regarded as mal in all situations. Amongst the animals one group is such that it has no proper physical scructure to be used for beneficial purposes and therefore not regarded as mal; others are created with submissive natures and are amenable to humarl beings such as domestic animals, and other tamable animals, which can be categorised as mal. Allama Suyuti refers to ImarnA l-Shafi'i as saying that, “the terminology mal should not be construed except as to what has value with which it is......

Words: 729 - Pages: 3

Free Speech and Internet

...maxims of humanity and justice… Reducing a man to slavery…[takes] from the slave not only all forms of property but also the ability to acquire it… (56). Condorcet employs the technique of de/humanizing his subjects to display the arbitrary nature of slavery. Moderates, slaves, and whites-anyone could achieve slave status under these random means. Society needs to prevent subordination. The white Condorcet speaks almost in apostrophe; the style of his introduction greatly resembles an ode. Addressing the slaves in this manner gives even more deference to the lowly slaves. Similarly, the slaves have been elevated to "My Friends," further humanizing their cause. Although Condorcet was a well-respected member of the National Assembly, he relates to the slaves how "he is not one of the them." The ordered diction again serves to equate a white man to a slave. This segment's tone lacks both condescension and sarcasm. He nearly supplicates to the slaves for their quintessence. His friends-the blacks-are his brethren. If he shares spirit, virtues, and reasons with slaves, what is to distinguish them? Condorcet has simultaneously made himself equal to a slave and visa versa. Therefore, if he is to enjoy rights, his colored counterpart should as well. Condorcet is a man. Luckily for pro-abolitionists, according to The Declaration of Man and Citizen all "Men are born and remain free and equal" (78). This logic was far from irrefutable, and Enlightened thinkers realized their......

Words: 1401 - Pages: 6

The Commodification of Free Speech

...specifically have many reasons to suspect that private information entered online is vulnerable to un-ethical intrusions by third parties. However, many groups and individuals have come together to bring resolution to the issue of personal privacy and national security. According to article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, no one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, or to attacks upon his honor and reputation (Lachmayer 749). However, the more subtle aspects of the new counter-terrorism age include a heightened amount of internet surveillance, video surveillance of public spaces, electronic eavesdropping, and data retention. Additionally governments have access to bank accounts, travel booking information, and data held in cloud storage (749). In other words, nearly every aspect of modern life can not only be monitored, but due to recent technological expanses, the captured information can also be stored for indefinite periods of time. The technological shifts which have made this large-scale eavesdropping possible, have also forced the wider society into a reflection on the need to balance personal privacy and national security. Of course, the rights to privacy can only be practiced in so far as it does not impede the rights of others or cause a threat to national security. However, in recent years the government’s ability to invade the private lives of its citizens has increasingly grown......

Words: 2685 - Pages: 11

Free Speech

...Hickory High School Principal, Eric Trosch. His parents filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, after the School District punished Justin for that conduct. The suit alleges, inter alia, that the School District’s punishment transcended Justin’s First Amendment right of expression. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Justin on his First Amendment claim. We originally affirmed the district court. See Layshock v. Hermitage School Dist., 593 F.3d 249 (3d Cir. 2010). Thereafter, we entered an order vacating that opinion and granting rehearing en banc. For the reasons that follow, we once again affirm the district court’s holding that the school district’s response to Justin’s conduct transcended the protection of free expression guaranteed by the First Amendment. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND In December of 2005, Justin Layshock was a seventeenyear old senior at Hickory High School, which is part of the Hermitage School District in Hermitage, Pennsylvania. Sometime between December 10th and 14th, 2005, while Justin was at his grandmother’s house during non-school hours, he used her computer to create what he would later refer to as a “parody profile” of his Principal, Eric Trosch. The only school resource that was even arguably involved in creating the profile was a photograph of Trosch that Justin copied from the School District’s website. Justin copied that picture with a simple “cut 5 and paste” operation using the computer’s internet......

Words: 9595 - Pages: 39

How Free Is Freedom of Speech

...How Free Is ‘Free Speech’ When Society Disagrees? Free speech is a complicated issue, not just in the United States, but in many other countries as well. Unfortunately the freedom of speech is not as simple as saying anything at any time. While by law, everyone in the United States is entitled to the freedom to speak their minds, social expectations and mainstream culture restrict what people are able to say. However, as society has progressed many social changes have been made by people who have refused to be silenced by mainstream culture. Movements such as the Civil Rights Movement and the LBGTQ movement have been started by people who have fully used their rights to free speech. This means that people are free to speak their minds, however, mainstream society often restricts what they can say. The First Amendment states that: ‘Congress shall make no law… prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…’ (Amend 1) This segment of the constitution clearly states that by law every United States Citizen is entitled to free speech by the government. Meaning that the government cannot prosecute anyone for expressing their opinions. However, like every law exceptions are made to protect citizens. This encompasses all acts that are governed by other laws, such as slander and incitement to violence or rebellion. By having the government restricting only harmful or suppressive speech those wishing to express their opinions in......

Words: 1282 - Pages: 6

Free Speech

...March 1, 2012 Freedom of speech is the idea that people can speak freely without being stopped, or censored. The United States First Amendment states that people have the right for absolute freedom of speech, which raises concern for when freedom of speech should be limited. Being able to speak freely is important. It allows us to speak our minds without being punished for our ideas. Freedom of speech in relevance to our time is very crucial. More and more people are beginning to voice their opinions and the construction of free speech is one of great importance. When thinking of free speech many issues and topics come into play. Today it seems that free speech in social networking has become increasingly prevalent. Over four hundred million people across the world are involved in some sort of social network, thus the importance of their voice when dealing with free speech. People want their voice to be heard, especially using things such as Twitter and Facebook. The issue of this however concerns the creators and if they should monitor what is being said on these sites. If social networking sites were to monitor our every action and every word, would we feel as if they abide by the freedom of speech law? What if one day you logged onto Facebook and there was a notification telling you that you were being monitored and could no longer say whatever you wanted whenever you wanted? Most of us would be outraged and angry that we could not express our opinions. No one......

Words: 1269 - Pages: 6

The Most Convincing Justification for Private Property

...The most convincing justification for private property provided by Ziff is that of economic efficiency. Private property incentivises innovation, lowers the cost of dealing with externalities, and with moderation, reduces the susceptibility of property to the tragedy of the commons. Economic efficiency holds particular weight because of the significant amount of today’s societies that rely on a market based system to conduct business, trade and commerce. This system lists private property as one of its founding tenets and therefore heightens the justification’s persuasiveness. It is not suggested that a fully privatised property regime would be ideal either, but a mixture of both private property and communal property is seen as the best method of achieving economic efficiency in market economies with common-pool resources. Private property provides incentives for innovation that supersede that of a society with communal property rights. The idea of communal property rights is said to be one that provides the best redistribution of wealth, such that a greater net utility is retained from an economy, an idea often referred to as the Benthemite view of utilitarianism. It does this through sharing information at no cost within parties. Ziff suggests that the sharing of property with communal interest holders stagnates innovation as it reduces the incentives for property holders to be more efficient. Demsetz, supports this claim by suggesting that incentives for innovation......

Words: 1191 - Pages: 5

Free Speech and Internet

...Free Speech In the 20th and 21st century, Internet access has been made possible by technology and service plans. It has been brought by changes in innovation and drastic industrial revolution; this has made consumer use become popularized through the dial-up connections, which facilitated marketing of products and communication globally using the term broadband. The U.N fights for Internet rights by declaring them as a human right for the universe to be able to access basic information and communication services (Hayes 98). Use of Internet around the world has grown rapidly due to the market saturation and growth of industrialized countries. This has brought growth to countries such as Brazil, Caribbean and the Middle East. It has grown tremendously with a margin of over a billion users in the past ten years from 670 million to 1.9 billion users. In order to promote accessibility to the nation, the government has invested large amounts of dollars to breach the gap that is between people with access to the Internet and those without (Hayes 108). By providing access to the Internet, more people are able to take advantage of political, economic, social and carrier opportunities. Internet democracy should be promoted as every citizen has an equal right and say in decisions affecting their lives and development of law legislation. Oppressive regimes such as China have taken measures to squash political opposing of Internet accessibility to its citizens in order to protect their...

Words: 1128 - Pages: 5

Peppermint FRENCH DVDRIP 2018 | Chuukan Kanriroku Tonegawa - Episode 23 | IAHCSMM Workbook Chapters 17-20