Roic

In: Business and Management

Submitted By APLUS
Words 1121
Pages 5
National University of Ireland, Dublin Master of Science (Finance) Intake 15 Module: Strategic Finance Submitted by: Win Lwin Student Number: 12254491 Lecturer: Mr. Soh Cheong Hian Submission Date: 17 May 2013 Word Count: 590

Question 1:
Exhibit 1 Company A Company B Company C 14.28 13 15.24 15.79 14.28 29

Return on assets (%) Return on Equity (%)

Referring to Exhibit 1, the rationale behind using the net operating profit after tax (NOPAT) for the calculation of return on assets and return on equity instead of using the net income is that a company’s profits are isolated by removing non operating or nonrecurring items from the reported earnings. Hence, by eliminating the interest expense in the profit calculation, the operating profitability is not distorted by differences in the capital structure of a company (Kabajeh, AL Nu’aimat & Dahmash, 2012). Company A and Company B does not use debt financing, using NOPAT or net income does not affect the return on assets and return on equity. However, Company C uses debt financing so using NOPAT in the calculations is more effective and accurate.
Exhibit 2 Invested Capital Company A Company B Company C Assets Inventory Accounts Payable Operating Working Capital Net PP&E Invested Capital Equity Investment Total Funds Invested 125 (50) 75 400 475 475 125 (50) 75 400 475 50 525 125 (50) 75 400 475 475

Reconciliation of total funds invested Company A Company B Company C Interest bearing debt 200 Common Stock 475 525 275 Retained Earnings Total funds invested 475 525 475

Exhibit 3 NOPAT Operating profit Operating tax NOPAT Company A Company B Company C 100 100 100 (25) (25) (20) 75 75 80

Exhibit 4 Return on Invested Capital NOPAT Invested Capital Return on Invested Capital (%) Company A Company B Company C 75 75 80 475 475 475 15.79 15.79 16.84

Operating performance wise, based on the three ratios Company…...

Similar Documents

Measuring Gmcr

...SELLOUT S Presentation to GMCR  Board of Directors April 19, 2012 Executive Summary: Betting on Quality, Convenience, and Choice Takeaway: GMCR has bet on a growing trend in speciality coffee by investing in creating value through quality, convenience, and choice for coffee drinkers. However, these investments rely on patent acquisitions, which have a short-lived contribution to ROIC, and customer relationships, one of which is brewing trouble. Page Section 3 Coffee Market Competitors • • Specialty, Brew-at-Home coffee Wakes U.S. coffee economy GMCR Competes most directly with Nestle and Mars by selling both coffee AND brewers Reinvestment and Acquisitions secure Competitive Advantage and enable profit growth Market position Built on Relationships, although Customers pose notable Risks Inventory management Concerns: Revenue & margins growing, but Inventory Outpacing Sales New Invested Capital has Dual Effect on ROIC Address Immediate Threats to Patents and Relationships 2 4 5 Competitive Advantage • 6 Partners • 7 Inventory Management • 8 ROIC Immediate Imperatives • • 9 Perking Up: Specialty Coffee Wakes U.S. Coffee Economy Takeaway: “Premium-ization” and rising disposable incomes drive 4.7% annualized demand growth, much of it led by popularity of speciality coffee and growing awareness of high-quality single-serve systems. US Coffee Market Trends Evolving Consumer Preferences Conventional Coffee % of......

Words: 1863 - Pages: 8

Costco

...Equity Target should have a higher profitability margin and Costco a higher asset turnover. [pic] [pic] 3. Which company is more profitable? We can see that Target is more profitable than Costco, mainly because of a profitability issue. Nevertheless it is possible to observe that Costco has a higher Asset Turnover. 4. Technical questions: a. ROA v/s ROE numerators: It has to do with the fact that ROA is a profitability measure of the whole company while ROE is a profitability measure for shareholders. The financial structure of the company affects the ROE not the ROA. b. ROIC v/s ROA: ROIC adjusts for non-operational assets, therefore we can have a more realistic measure of asset’s profitability. c. Long Term ROA / ROE / ROIC: d. What explains differences in ROA: Profitability and Asset Turnover. e. Better Understanding of Companies’ Profitability: By breaking down ROA you can better understand where the company is doing well and where you can find areas of improvement....

Words: 284 - Pages: 2

Business Report

...measures to evaluate profitability, such as analysing rate of return on sale (ROS) (Investopedia 2011). However, the return on invested capital (ROIC), also known as return on capital, is the better indicator of a company’s long-term financial information because key summarise contributors are used from both income statement and balance sheet (Subramanyam & Wild 2009, pp. 447-8). It is generally believed that 6/10 Peishu Liang (Athena) 22859 the bigger figures of ROIC refer to the better profitability. The profitability of Cochlear will be analysed through ROIC in the following. After calculation based on the statistics of financial annual report, the ratio of ROIC of Cochlear from 2005 to 2011 are 2.08 percent, 5.34 percent, 6.36 percent, 6.15 percent, 6.03 percent, 6.39 percent and 8.25 percent respectively (the results rounded to four decimal place). Figure one represents the calculation results over the past seven years. Figure 1: The ratio of return on invested capital of Cochlear (percentage) Return on invested capital 9 8 7 6 Percentage 5 4 3 2 1 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2.08 6.36 5.34 6.15 6.03 6.39 8.25 Source: Adapted from annual report of Cochlear In figure one, x-axis indicates financial year whilst y-axis represents percentage of ROIC. From the data, in 2005, it can be seen that ROIC of Cochlear was just 2.08 per cent, which was followed by a dramatic rise to 5.34 percent in 2006. It went up to 7/10 Peishu Liang......

Words: 1462 - Pages: 6

Levi's Case

...the production and supply chain capability and reduce the delay which Was about 8 months from ordering to selling. Strauss started an experiment in its 4 retails store with collaboration of custom Clothing Technology Corporation, software firm based in Massachusetts US. This helped Strauss to get custom measurement of their customers and sort out The best fittings for their customers and has bar code sewn for reordering same Fitting of personal pair™. 1) Calculation of PRETAX ROIC FOR BOTH CHANNELS 1. PRETAX ROIC FOR BOTH OF THE CHANNELS. 1) Wholesaler Channel PRETAX ROIC = Pre Tax Operating Profit /Total Investment PRETAX ROIC = 20% 2) Original Levi’s Store PRETAX ROIC = PRETAX Operating Profit / Total Investment PRETAX ROIC = 12.24% As we compare both of the Channels Estimates wholesaler Channel is doing much Better returns, the higher the ROIC the valuable the division or a company. Original Levi’s Store’s ROIC even after investing lot on assets and charging a good Margin is not satisfactory due to capitulating kind of vast selling, administrative Expenses . How will personal pair™ System will change the value chain? 2) The new Experiment by Strauss in a collaboration with a software firm (CCTC) Will change the value chain. First we will consider the support activities that was used and now will be as per personal pair needs * Firm’s Infrastructure will be affected by the......

Words: 1041 - Pages: 5

Boeing Company Valuation

...                         12,000   10,000   8,000   6,000   4,000   2,000   0   1   -­‐2,000   2   3   4   5   FCFF   FCFE   Question  5:     When  observing  the  returns  on  invested  capital  over  the  past  5  years  (from  2008   to   2012),   we   can   see   that   it   oscillates   around   10%.   ROIC   is   usually   constant   each   year,  except  for  2009  where  ROIC  was  4.98%.  We  believe  this  drop  is  due  to  the   global  crisis  :  BOEING  has  obtained  weakest  results  in  2009:  (negative  free  cash   flow,  lowest  net  income  compared  to  other  years).       ROIC   Rate       We  assumed  that  the  relatively  constant  ROIC  rate  of  10%  would  remain  stable   for  the  near  future.  Therefore,  we  have  used  the  arithmetic  average  of  10.01%  in   our  calculations.           2012   12.41%   2011   12.21%   2010   11.29%   2009   4.98%   2008   9.18%   AVERAGE   10.01%   Question  6:     When   observing   the   reinvestment   rates   over ......

Words: 1020 - Pages: 5

Corp Finance

...growth. j. What is return on invested capital (ROIC)? Why is the spread between ROIC and WACC so important? Answer: ROIC is the return on the capital that is in place at the beginning of the period: If the spread between the expected return, ROICt+1, and the required return, WACC, is positive, then MVA is positive and growth makes MVA larger. The opposite is true if the spread is negative. k. KFS has two divisions. Both have current sales of $1,000, current expected growth of 5%, and a WACC of 10%. Division A has high profitability (OP=6%) but high capital requirements (CR=78%). Division B has low profitability (OP=4%) but low capital requirements (CR=27%). What is the MVA of each division, based on the current growth of 5%? What is the MVA of each division if growth is 6%? Answer: Division A Division B OP 6% 6% 4% 4% CR 78% 78% 27% 27% Growth 5% 6% 5% 6% MVA (300.0) (360.0) 300.0 385.0 l. What is the ROIC of each division for 5% growth and for 6% growth? How is this related to MVA? Answer: Division A Division B Capital0 $780 $780 $270 $270 Growth 5% 6% 5% 6% Sales1 $1,050 $1,060 $1,050 $1,060 Nopat1 $63 $63.6 $42 $42.4 Roic1 8.1% 8.2% 15.6% 15.7% Mva (300.0) (360.0) 300.0 385.0 The expected ROIC of division A is less than the WACC, so the division should postpone growth efforts until it improves ROIC by reducing capital requirements (e.g., reducing......

Words: 1356 - Pages: 6

The Fresh Market

...performance feedback from others & intentionally develops opportunity areas, conducts oneself in a professional manner at all times. o Decision Quality § Identifies core issues when analyzing concerns, draws accurate conclusions based on data, & anticipates potential concerns & consequences. o Technical Skill § TFM places strong focus on technical skills & abilities. For the “ROIC & WACC” slide: · The industry average ROIC is 10.75%. · Whole Foods most recent ROIC is 12.57%. Therefore they are also adding value because their WACC is 8.75% which equals (12.57-8.75) 3.82%. · TFM is actually adding value at a better pace than WFM because its value added is higher than WFM. o Both companies have a competitive advantage · Kroger’s ROIC is 9.53% and their WACC is 8.38% which means that its value equals (9.53-8.38) 1.15%. · The Fresh Market is placed in Quadrant 2 because while they do have a competitive advantage their strategy appears to not be working. Their strategy has worked in the past but recently they have seen a decline in ROIC indicating that their strategy may not be working. Random points v There are 3 reasons shoppers go to The Fresh Market. (said by Craig Carlock, CEO) o Food quality with its focus on “health, fresh, local, regional” o Superior customer service o Neighbor grocery atmosphere v Whole foods Market appears to be more differentiated than The Fresh Market which is representative in the......

Words: 646 - Pages: 3

Brigham

...importante porque mede o valor real da empresa. Os cinco usos do FCF são: a. Pagar juros sobre a divida b. Pagar o principal em divida c. Pagar dividendos d. Comprar de volta ações e. Compra de ativos não operacionais d) NOPAT = EBIT*(1-taxa) NOPAT(10)= 17,440*(1-0,4)= $10,464 NOPAT(9)= $125,460 Os ativos circulantes sao as contas que representam os bens e direitos da empresa. Os passivos circulantes são as obrigações e dividas que a empresa possui. NOWC=ATIVOS CIRCULANTES – PASSIVOS CIRCULANTES NOWC(10)= $1,317,842 NOWC(9)=793,800 e) FCF= nopat – Capital de Invesimento Liquido = 10,648-(2,257,632-1,138,600) = - $1,108,568 f) ROIC = NOPAT/ Total do Capital Liquido Operacional ROIC(10)= 10,464/2,257,632=0,5% ROIC (9)=11,0% O ROIC em 2012 foi menor do que 10%, portanto, os investidores obtiveram o retorno que esperavam. g) EVA = NOPAT – (WACC)*(CAPITAL) EVA(10)= 10,464 – (0,1)*(2,257,632)= - $215,299 EVA (9) = $11,600...

Words: 338 - Pages: 2

Creating Value Through Best-in-Class Capital Allocation

...value annually on capex and R&D, respectively. • U.S. companies were either the acquirer and/or the target in $13.6 trillion of M&A deals. • The return on capital (ROIC) of S&P 500 companies hovered between 9% and 13%.3 • The bottom quartile realized an average ROIC of 6.7%, while the top quartile earned an average ROIC of 16.7%. • The weighted average cost of capital for a typical S&P 500 company was 8.2% over the same period. Figure 1 shows the time trend in capex and R&D. This pattern is comforting, as it demonstrates that even during a historic financial crisis and recession, companies had the financial flexibility to continue to invest massively in innova- D tion, growth and expansion. The sub-par track record on returns on invested capital suggests, however, that capital allocation deserves a closer look. As Figure 2 shows, there is a wide variation in ROIC across companies, with some performing exceptionally well, while others did not return their cost of capital.4 ROIC is a book measure, yet investor market returns have also been disappointing this last decade. From 1999 to 2008, S&P 500 investors earned a negative total return of -13%, or an annual return of -1.4%. Interestingly, the companies with top quartile ROICs also generated the highest stock returns, whereas companies with bottom quartile ROICs generated the lowest stock returns. Most companies have developed sophisticated capital allocation processes that involve a combination of quantitative methods,......

Words: 5212 - Pages: 21

Cash Flow & Cost of Capital

...Cash  Flow  and  Cost  of  Capital   Learning  Objec-ves     2 ¨  Cash  flow  to  invested  capital   ¤  $4,000.00   $3,500.00   $3,000.00   $2,500.00   Free  cash  flow       NOA NIBCL NOA ¨  Rate  cost  of  capital   ¤  NIBCL C IC OA Weighted  average  cost  of  capital   Includes  all  costs  of  capital     Fair  value  of  invested  capital     $2,000.00   $1,500.00   $1,000.00   $500.00   $-­‐ IC ¨  Economic  profit   ¤  ¨  Value  of  the  firm     ¤  roic    >  k FCFi V=∑ i i (1 + k) N ¨  Financial  decision  criterion  over     mul-ple  periods   3 State-­‐ ment   of   Cash   Flows   Statement  of  Cash  Flows   4 ¨  ¨  ¨  This  financial  statement  details  the  change  in  the  balance   sheet  cash  and  equivalents  accounts,  CE,  during  an   accoun-ng  period.       CEi    =  CEi-­‐1  +  CFOi  +  CFIi  +  CFFi    =  CEi-­‐1  +  ∆CE     ∆CE  =  CFO  +  CFI  +  CFF     ¤  ¤  ¤  CFO  is  the  cash  flow  from  opera-ng  ac-vi-es     CFI  is  the  cash  flow  from  inves-ng  ac-vi-es   CFF  is  cash  flow  from  financing  ac-vi-es   Statement  of  Cash  Flows     5   Statement  of  Cash  Flows     Balance  Sheet ......

Words: 2951 - Pages: 12

Valuation

...pendorong utama nilai : pengembalian investasi modal (ROIC ) dan pertumbuhan pendapatan . Memeriksa tren dalam panjang perusahaan menjalankan kinerja dan kinerja relatif dengan yang sejenis , sehingga Anda dapat mendasarkan perkiraan Anda dari arus kas masa depan pada asumsi yang wajar tentang driver perusahaan kunci nilai. Mulailah dengan menganalisis ROIC , baik dengan dan tanpa niat baik . ROIC dengan goodwill mengukur kemampuan perusahaan untuk menciptakan nilai lebih dan di atas premiums dibayar untuk akuisisi . ROIC tanpa goodwill adalah ukuran yang lebih baik dari kinerja perusahaan dibandingkan dengan perusahaan sejenis . Kemudian menelusuri ke dalam komponen ROIC untuk membangun pandangan yang terintegrasi dari perusahaan operasi kinerja , dan memahami aspek-aspek bisnis yang bertanggung jawab untuk kinerja secara keseluruhan . Berikutnya , memeriksa driver dari suka pertumbuhan pendapatan . Apakah pertumbuhan pendapatan didorong , misalnya , lainnya pertumbuhan organik ( penting untuk penciptaan nilai , seperti dibahas dalam Bab 5 ) atau dengan efek mata uang, yang sebagian besar di luar kendali manajemen dan mungkin tidak berkelanjutan ? Akhirnya , menilai kesehatan keuangan perusahaan untuk menentukan apakah ia memiliki sumber daya keuangan untuk melakukan bisnis dan membuat jangka pendek dan jangka panjang investasi. Tiga bagian pertama dari bab ini melalui langkah-langkah yang terlibat dalam menganalisis ROIC , pertumbuhan pendapatan , dan kesehatan keuangan ,......

Words: 2089 - Pages: 9

Coke 2001

...What is EVA? Focuses on managerial effectiveness in a given year. A firm adds value when its ROIC is greater than its WACC. If WACC exceeds ROIC, then new investments in operating capital will reduce firm’s value. Estimate of a business’s true economic profit for the year. Represents residual income that remains after cost of capital has been deducted. Measures the extent firm has increased shareholder value. Economic Value Added (EVA) 13. Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) Q. What is WACC? The current weighted average cost a company faces for new or marginal dollar of capital. It is not the average cost of dollars raised in the past. Percentages of each capital component should be based on management's target capital structure. Weights used in estimating the WACC should be based on market values, not book values. Weights used in calculating WACC should also be based on expected future weights, which are the firm's target weights. 14. Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT) $4,797 $4,470 $3,956 Total (2,131) (1,957) (1,738) Cash Taxes 295 295 295 Goodwill Amortization $6,633 $6,132 $5,399 Operating Income 2003 2002 2001 15. Invested Capital Loans and notes payable Current portion of long-term debt Long-term debt Deferred taxes Total equity line Accumulated losses Accumulated goodwill amortization (Marketable securities) Total Invested Capital 16. Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) One method to determine whether growth is profitable. Ratio of NOPAT to total......

Words: 804 - Pages: 4

Kodak Case Analysis

...market in these 2 different sectors with their own printers and ink that will cost half the price of the inks in the stores now. Kodak may run into some issues in the future and will cause problems for inkjet-printer makers. With the low price in ink, the other companies will have to respond. For instance, they may have to make their printers compatible with this ink keep printer sales from dropping. The future holds growth for the segment of inkjet printing but not for Kodak. Over the next decade ink-based printing will yield some volumes to digital printing technologies but those who already own these ink-based printers won’t be likely to shy away from it. Looking at Kodak’s ROA and ROIC for the past year shows that this company is not in great shape at all. Kodak’s ROA sitting at -20.5% and their ROIC at -363.5% is not the most attractive for investors. Kodak has the opportunity to make a splash with cheaper ink and if they can find a way to make it compatible with printers already owned, it could attract the larger masses of those who already own printers. With Kodak being a popular company in the digital market, they already have strong brand recognition so with them entering this market, they do have some up sight. There are major threats that face Kodak such as the slowdown in market growth. Over the years, with more competitors entering this market, it has been little growth. The emergence of the digital world has shifted the buyer’s power upward so the threat of a......

Words: 1786 - Pages: 8

Levi Strauss

...Case Name: Levi Strauss – Case 1 Short Cycle Process: • Who: Levi Strauss Management • When: 1995 • Where: United States/Globally Case Analysis: Issues #1 – Customer Satisfaction & the “Perfect Pair” Kiosks The “Perfect Pair” kiosks pilot project has been operating for a year now, and this has provided enough data to analyze whether Levi Strauss should continue with this project as is, expand or terminate this venture. The “Perfect Pair” kiosks will be reviewed in comparison to the current wholesale and retail operations to determine whether it provides the best return on invested capital. Applicable Concepts Product Pricing and ROIC Value Chain Analysis Product Mix Qualitative Analysis The alternative value chain for these kiosks is significantly changed in comparison to the wholesale and retail operations, and this is due to the processes involved in producing the kiosks end product. The new process reduces the time lag between start to finish of the value chain in comparison to traditional product lines. Expanding the kiosks to other retail locations will provide Levi’s with the opportunity to better respond to current industry shifts, while also providing greater satisfaction to its customers. Since Levi’s is not going to initiate the manufacturing process until after the sale has occurred, the need for intensive budgeting and forecasting is reduced for the “Perfect Pair” kiosks. The new alternative value chain also results in a......

Words: 845 - Pages: 4

Mini Case

...440*1-40%). The operating current assets are cash, inventory, and accounts receivable used in operations. The operating current liabilities are accounts payable and accruals resulting from operations. Computron has $1,317,842 (=7,282+632,160+1,287,360-324,000-284,960) net operating working capital and total net operating capital is the same since Computron does not have any plant or equipment specified in their balance sheet. e. Computron’s free cash flow is ($513,578) (=10,464-524,042). Since there is a negative free cash flow Computron will not be able to use anything to pay off debt, dividends, buy investments, etc. f. ROIC = NOPAT/ TOTAL NET OPERATING CAPITAL NOPAT= EBIT* (1-TAX RATE) ROIC (2009) =$ 125,460/ $1,138,600 = 11% ROIC (2010) = $10,464/ $2,257,632 = 0.5% Computron’s growth has not added value, after the growth the ROIC dropped from 11% in 2009 to 0.5% in 2010. Meaning the investors did not receive the return they wanted in 2010 after the changes have occurred. g. EVA = NOPAT - (WACC)(CAPITAL) EVA 2009 = $125,460–(10%)$(1,138,600) = $11,600 EVA 2010 = $10,464-(10%)($2,257,632) = $-215,299 h. MVA = Market Value of Stock – Total Equity MVA 2009 = $850,000-$663,768= $186,232 MVA 2010 = $600,000-$557,632= $42,368 Between the years of 2009 to 2010 Computron’s market value added (MVA) decreased. i. Tax Liability = $100,000 (operating income) + $5,000 (Interest income) + $3,000 (Dividend income = $10,000*30%) = $108,000 of taxable......

Words: 591 - Pages: 3

Laura (0) | Luke Pasqualino | اللغة العربي