Siemens Bribery Scandal

In: Business and Management

Submitted By popcorn123
Words 1653
Pages 7
International Management – Siemens Case Study Group Coursework Presentation
Question 2
Introduction
Klaus Kleinfeld took over as CEO of Siemens in 2005 from Heinrich von Pierer and was at the helm of the company until his resignation on the 25th April 2007. During his time he was seen as an enigmatic premier who transformed the company. The stock had grown by 39% since he took over (Global Business 07/05/2007). He streamlined the organisation by cutting costs, boosting innovation and expanding abroad. He even maintained a rise in the company’s share price during the bribery scandals publicity.
Was the board right to accept his resignation?
This was a highly sensitive decision at the time because the bribery scandals came to light whilst Kleinfeld was CEO but he had worked magic at Siemens in a very short amount of time, in only two years he had transformed Siemens and their share price had grown exponentially as a result.
Based upon his track record at the company he did not deserve to be released in that manner. The bribery came to light during Klienfeld’s tenure but most of payments were made during von Pierer’s time as CEO. Kleinfeld pushed Siemens employees to make faster decisions and put as much emphasis on the customers as on the technology. He sold off the unprofitable mobile phone production to BenQ and fostered a JV between Nokia and Siemens to merge their mobile and fixed line phone equipment businesses to create one of the world’s biggest network firms. In addition he invested $6 billion in 2006 on acquiring positions in growing areas such as medical diagnostics and wind power. Overall he left the company in a very strong position, indeed only hours before he tendered his resignation the company announced that its operating profit in the most recent quarter had soared by 49% to $2.7 billion. It is also apparent that Kleinfeld was forced out to…...

Similar Documents

The Bribery Scandal at Siemens Ag Analysis

...The Bribery Scandal at Siemens AG Analysis Lvao Guo Arkansas State University The Bribery Scandal at Siemens AG Analysis This case discusses the bribery scandals that happened in Siemens AG in 2006 and 2007. There are a series of scandals involve that some of the company's employees establish slush funds to obtain contracts. In another case, they were accused by IG Metall of bribing a union. It bribes the labor representatives of supervisory board to enlist their support of policy. Since then, the company managers' bribery at the Italian energy company employees was convicted by German officials. After the raid on Siemens offices in Germany, they continued to investigate the possible misconduct on Siemens in several other countries like the US, Greece, Italy and Switzerland. Due to the aftermath of the scandal, the company's Chief Executive Officer Klaus Kleinfeld and Supervisory Board Chairman Heinrich von Peeler had to resign, even if they did not directly implicate. With the Siemens bribery scandal surfaced, Volkswagen AG, Duetusche Telecom AG, Duetsche Bahn AG, and Deutche Post AG unethical business practices exposed at the same time in Germany. Those corruption scandals make a query for the German Co-determination law and Mitbestimmug—wondering if they were flawed. From the viewpoint of a Siemens employee who is willing to break the law in order to gain large profits, it was definitely worth it. However, in my opinion, enterprises have to face the legal......

Words: 457 - Pages: 2

Case 1: the Bribery Scandal at Siemens Ag

...illegal or just a cost of doing business? Discuss this in light of Siemens’ bribery scandal. We believe that bribing is unethical because it takes away the fairness of a business transaction between bidders of a contract. Bribing also has a negative impact on competition because it allows for oligopolies and monopolies to emerge in an industry due to smaller competitors being unable to financially compete with the amount of the bribes. This in turn  creates a barrier for entry for prospective companies and promotes the oligopoly or monopoly in place. The lack of competition affects consumer choice by reducing their options which then stifles innovation within the industry as there is no need to generate a competitive advantage to attain customers. The legality of bribing depends on the laws of the home country that the business is based from. For example, Siemens is a German based business and German law states that bribing officials of another country to win business contracts is illegal. So, under German law, Siemens was guilty of bribing an official when it bribed employees of the Italian company Enel to gain a contract as Enel was 68% owned by the Italian government. The counter-argument is that bribing is the cost of doing business. We disagree with this because the economic benefits gained from bribing are not outweighing the cost to a company’s reputation. As we see in this case, Siemens paid a 6 million euro bribe to secure a contract valued at 450......

Words: 1655 - Pages: 7

Bribery Scandal

...doing business? I believe that bribing is unethical, not only on the person doing the bribe but also for the person receiving the bribe. There is a famous saying that says "it takes two to tango". In the Siemens case, the bribery was in all of their doings. I believe that it wasn't necessary to use bribe to win over the contracts. What companies need to do to win over contracts is to actually sell their products, believing that it's going to benefit the country and show the countries how. Maybe instead for giving millions of dollars in bribe money actually give them a big discount. 2. The board had their reasons to not extend Kleinfeld's term, despite his good performance and was not being directly implicated in the bribery scandal. From the beginning he was not received well by the conservative old generation because of his American style of work. So I believe that the board was not right in not extending Kleinfeld's term, because their reasons to do so had nothing to do with the bribery scandal, but personal. The main challenge for the new CEO was to bring the company out the bribery scandals and sustain the growth set by Kleinfeld and above all gain the confidence of labor and management within Siemens. Siemens was really at fault in this bribery case. On account of increasing competition companies were resorting to illegal payments to win international contracts especially in some emerging economies...

Words: 354 - Pages: 2

Bribery

...Bribery is a common ethical problem in business and normal life and as the author stated in the Toronto Star article, “it is every CEO’s worst nightmare” to find his company name under a bribery scandal headline. However, this ethical problem might not be considered a problem in other countries in the world. The question that has been raised and discussed in the class, given this fact, is what should an international company do in situations in which it either bribes or loses in foreign countries? Should it accept the fact that bribery as part of the business in this country or should it maintain the same ethical standards it used to hold in its country of origin Clearly the active agent in this case is the international company. The passive agents are competitors, society and investors. There are only two choices, in my opinion, for the company; either to bribe or not to bribe. Although we discussed another choice in our class in which a company use a local agent to do all the dirty tasks, but I believe it is exactly the same as paying the bribe by itself. If we apply the utilitarianism model to analyze this situation focusing on the purpose of maximizing company’s profits, some people might not consider the company's bribes unethical activities. As long as the company’s market share is increasing and investors are gaining more money, nobody cares what the company has done to accomplish these goals. In my opinion, under the same method of analysis and only considering......

Words: 1693 - Pages: 7

Siemens Ag Bribery

...Siemens AG Bribery Scandal This paper will focus on the analysis of the well-known and popular bribery scandal in the world, such as Siemens AG Bribery Scandal which occurred in November, 2006. Siemens AG is one of the largest and most popular electrical engineering companies operated in the world. The present company was founded in 1847 in Berlin and is now headquartered in Munich, Germany. The discussion and the proper analysis of this bribery scandal will help to learn many effective lessons from this situation helping organizations and individuals to avoid such cases and experiences in the future. Siemens was considered one of the most powerful and productive companies in the field of electronics and that bribery scandal surely affected its business and popularity in the world greatly. It was difficult to understand the underlying causes of this bribery scandal, especially on the part of such large, successful and popular company known not only in Germany but also all over the world. In fact, several employees and even executive board members were charged guilty in this scandal and imposed huge monetary fines for illegal and unethical behavior harming the business of the company greatly. Brooks and Dunn stated that the company developed a corrupt organizational culture “in which hundreds of millions of Euros were put into slush funds that were then used to pay bribes in order to obtain lucrative contracts” (Brooks and Dunn 290-291). There were several cases of such......

Words: 1268 - Pages: 6

Org 670 Siemens

...Jan 10, 2013 Case Study 1 – Siemens 1. In our opinion bribery is an unethical practice but through the eyes of Siemens and many other countries temporally the opinion of what constitutes unethical practice is in the eye of the beholder. Different countries over the long history of Siemens have added, removed, and modified their bribery policies. But, Siemens obviously hid the fact that they were bribing to obtain business so through the very act of hiding they are deemed unethical. If Siemens took the money they spent on bribery, lower the bid on the contract, show quality and build a loyal relationship over time then they could have invested the same amount and not had to face the burden of the image issues and the fines. In addition, they could have also leverage equity in their company for business in other regions. 2. We feel that the board was right not to extend his term as CEO. Because under his leadership employees were able to find loopholes to bribe businesses that led to the scandal. In order to move forward with a better image and remove itself from the scandal Siemens would have to show a change in leadership. The positive impacts of his departure on the company were a stronger internal compliance and controls and corporate governance. The greatest negative impact would be his knowledge and his clout within the German business world. We believe that Siemens is at fault. They and a large amount of......

Words: 289 - Pages: 2

Siemens Bribery Scandal Case Study

...Case Study: Siemens Bribery Scandal 1. Corruption was deeply embedded in Siemen’s business culture. They rationalized this corruption by stating that it was not illegal to initiate bribes to government officials. This was true, however not anymore, the law changed in 1999 prohibiting such acts of corruption. 2. If a manager at Siemens would have stood up and took a stand against corruption, I think that he/she would have most likely been fired for being insubordinate. The higher executives that were promoting such bribery would have wanted these managers to go along with what they were doing. The manager could have also been demoted possibly, or just plain and simple reamed out by the higher executives. 3. Siemens spent extra money to secure future business investments. This in, in turn, means that other companies, even ones that might have an advantage, lose business opportunities. The entire concept of such corruption completely disregards competition, because it simply removes it, unless other companies also engage in bribery. 4. Some economists argue that doing such practices such as bribery is the price that must be paid to perform a greater good. They support this claim by stating that it can promote efficiency and growth in countries that have pervasive and cumbersome regulations, and may also enhance welfare in countries that have preexisting political structures that distort the workings of the market mechanism. On the other hand other......

Words: 426 - Pages: 2

Bribery Scandal Siemans

...Bribery Scandal Case Summary This case covers the scandal at Siemens AG in 2006, 2007 which consisted of employees bribing foreign officials. Siemens employees made slush funds specifically for the purpose of gaining an unfair advantage to win contracts. They also were accused of bribing officials of the labor board in return they would give support for Siemen’s policies. Siemens office in Germany was raided and an official investigation was started. In other countries they were investigated subsequently following the raid in Germany. The CEO resigned regardless of not being found responsible though the scandal was under his watch. This scandal set off a chain reaction to questioning the other companies in competition and the laws in Germany made to deter this behavior. Labor representatives who had been possibly bribed held the board, which governed the laws. This created an element of people responsible of making sure this type of thing did not happen, by letting it happen for personal gain. All along critics of this type of management feared this to be a potential issue. This shed light upon the challenges that the new management would encounter after the scandal occurred. In your opinion, is “bribing” unethical & illegal or just a cost of doing business? Discuss this in light of Siemens’ bribery scandal. Bribing is unethical and it takes the level playing arena away from business and all that compete within it. Oligopolies and monopolies arise from this......

Words: 418 - Pages: 2

Siemens Case Study

...Siemens AG is a German multinational engineering and electronics conglomerate company headquartered in Berlinand Munich. It is Europe's largest engineering company and maker of medical diagnostics equipment and its medical health-care division, which generates about 12 percent of the company's total sales, is its second-most profitable unit behind the industrial automation division. Siemens' principal activities are in the fields of industry, energy, transportation and healthcare. It is organized into four main divisions: Industry, Energy, Healthcare, and Infrastructure & Cities. Siemens and its subsidiaries employ around 360,000 people across nearly 190 countries and reported global revenue of approximately €78.3 billion in 2012. The company has been the subject of a number of controversies in its history. There were a series of scandals that involved some of the company's employees bribing foreign officials to gain contracts and creating slush funds for this purpose. In 2008, it was revealed that Siemens had bribed the two main political parties of Greece for approximately 10 years to be the sole provider of mechanical and electrical equipment of the Greek state. After the exposure the German authorities moved to arrest the representatives of Siemens in Greece, who had managed to escape from the Greek authorities. The German judicial system didn't allow the Greek authorities to cross-question the representatives. As a result, there wasn't any solid evidence against the...

Words: 655 - Pages: 3

The Siemens

...INTRODUCTION Background of Siemens Siemens is a Germany-based company that established in October 12, 1847. It is one of the world’s largest electronics and industrial engineers firms. The products produce by Siemens includes industrial controls, lighting products, power generation equipment and transportation systems. Siemens operates in 190 countries worldwide with recent annual revenues exceeding $100 billion. Opening Case The case started when a senior executive at Siemens Company received a phone call from their business partner in Saudi Arabia. The person who made the call blackmailed Siemens to pay $190 million in U.S currency otherwise he will disclose the corruption made by Siemens in order to win contracts in Saudi Arabia. Since then, the series of events started whereby there are police raids, forensic investigations and arrests top of executives in Siemens. Based on the case, the investigators believed that Siemens has a culture of corruption, that endorsed by senior managers in order to win contracts. The way of bribe used is by the managers will bring the money in their suitcases with confident that they are doing “business as usual”. Case Chronology Started in 1970s until 2007, Siemens has being alleged for a series of scandal include accusation of bribery given to government officials in numerous countries around the world. The actions included one of the former executive of Siemens was accused for handling $77 million in bribes while another......

Words: 3251 - Pages: 14

Bribery Scandal

...For this assignment our learning team discussed the Bribery Scandal at Siemens AG. As a group we analyzed the case and conducted additional research to answer critical questions in each key section. Supported by the course material and supplemental articles, the team compiled the research that discussed Internet technologies, affective technologies in management development strategies, global alliances and provided recommendations on cross border operations. Key issues Analysis of the Siemens case resulted in several key issues which explained the bribery scandal. Lack of leadership is the primary cause for the Siemens representatives convicted of bribery in 2007. The intention of the bribery was to ensure that Siemens obtained needed global contracts. The methodology offered supported no personal gain from this bribery and the organization gained contracts which negated a cause for an illegal act. In addition, Siemens was operated in countries where these acts were considered legal. There were no other documented strategies to obtain the contracts that did not include illegal activity (Deresky, 2011). Although managers were able to offer defenses against the allegations, the underlying issue in this case is poor leadership will result in multiple scandals. The leadership team within this organization took no responsibility from an international perspective to create an ethical environment and standards for their employees. There was no acknowledgement of illegal......

Words: 923 - Pages: 4

Bribery Scandal at Siemens Ag

...This case discusses the bribery scandals that were unearthed at Siemens AG (Siemens) in 2006 and 2007. There were a series of scandals that involved some of the company's employees bribing foreign officials to gain contracts and creating slush funds for this purpose. More so, in this case, the company was accused of bribing labor representatives on the supervisory board in order to gain their support for its policies. After the German authorities conducted raids on Siemens' offices in Germany, investigations were initiated on Siemens in several other countries like the US, Greece, Italy and Switzerland for possible misconduct. As fallout of this scandal, the CEO of the company, Klaus Kleinfeld and the chairman of the supervisory board, Heinrich von Pierer; had to resign even though they were not directly implicated (Durgaaus, 2008). With bribery scandals surfacing in Siemens and many other German companies like Volkswagen, questions were also raised about the effectiveness of the Co-determination law in Germany, which advocated a system in which a supervisory board governed the management board and at least half the supervisory board seats had to be filled by labor representatives. In such a system, critics contended that the management always needed the labor representatives' support to be in job and gain support for company policies, which led to a suspicious alliance between them. The case also highlights the opinions of several analysts on the issues related to......

Words: 257 - Pages: 2

Corruption and Bribery

...Corruption and Bribery April 29, 2015 Abstract In this paper, I will be writing about corruption and bribery. I will define the terms and go on to explain the regulations that have been put in place to stop corruption and bribery. I will then go on to give examples of major corruption and bribery scandals that companies have recently been in and what has been done to punish said companies for their crime. Intro Corruption is defined in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary as “dishonest or illegal behavior especially by powerful people (such as government officials or police officers), the act of corrupting someone or something, and something that has been changed from its original form”. (Merriam-Webster) Bribery is defined as “something valuable (such as money) that is given in order to get someone to do something”. (Merriam-Webster). A bribe can be from person to person, company to company, or even country to country and it is considered a crime in most parts of the world. Many would agree that there is a lot of bribery and corruption in modern day politics as well as International companies, but I will not be going into that for it is another huge topic. “Bribery and corruption are major obstacles to socio-economic development and distort national and international economic relations.” (IBE) This corruption is seen as an unfair advantage for companies with a lot of money to throw away to get what they want and is considered very unethical in the......

Words: 1781 - Pages: 8

Bribery

...Research Methodology • Title A study of the effect of bribery and corruption with lack of censorship in the governmental institution There are various reasons why corruption takes place and takes hold. Sometimes it is due to the fact that officials are simply not paid very much and so they need to supplement their salaries with money from bribes. Sometimes the bureaucratic system is set up in such a way that officials simply refuse to carry out their duties unless they are ‘encouraged’ by being offered bribes. In other cases it is actually part of the tradition and culture of a country to give and receive ‘gifts’ in order to get anything done. In some cases companies from less corrupt countries allegedly engage in bribery in order to do business in countries where corruption is the norm, otherwise they would not be able to operate successfully in those countries. It can be argued that if such companies did not bribe officials in the necessary countries then the economies of those countries would suffer because fewer companies would invest in them, thus making them poorer. On a smaller scale corruption is often just a result of people’s natural desire to ‘beat the system’. Mostly, corruption occurs in environments where it is tolerated and where the temptation is too strong to resist. In the following paragraph there are some examples of how bribes take place in each and every one of them. • Problem Statement  Main Problem: A person gives some money to......

Words: 2201 - Pages: 9

Bribery and Corruption in International Trade

...Bribery and corruption is a way of life in many countries. These practices affect the way international business is regularly conducted. However, in most of these countries, it is illegal to offer or receive bribes or engage in corrupt practices. Yet corrupt practices are a part of the ‘culture’ of ‘doing businesses. Unless companies ‘conform’ to such practices, in many cases, international business cannot be transacted. This paper will attempt to provide discussion about bribery and corruption in international trade example in vary different point of view in according to the principal ethical system suchlike religious, philosophical and ‘natural’. It will anayize the case of Siemens bribery scandal related to ethical issues. Bribery is a most important issue of concern to many companies. Incidents of bribery vary across many countries. Not everyone has the same opinion about this issue. Hong Kong and Greek managers are less critical of bribery in certain situations than Americas. Paying bribery carries with it a great risk to damaging the company reputation with the country which the briberies are paid and at home. Moreover, there is also the risk that the corporate culture of the company will become more open-minded of several of other practices at the legal issues. There is also evidence to suggest that those countries with the reputation for bribery and corruption damage themselves as it reflects in their economic growth has a low rates for high level of......

Words: 1520 - Pages: 7

毒液:致命守护者 Venom 2018 HD720P AAC x264 English CHS-ENG BTDX8 | For quick fix on Gmail forgot password, avail our reliable customer service 1-855-479-1999 | Tubemate apk full